Re: IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO SAY 'CONSTITUTION'

More | Report Post

On 10/19/03, KL wrote:
> On 7/11/03, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote:
>>
>> Dear Judy,
>>
>>
>> Yes, keep us posted on the outcome of the trial! Looks
>> like a terrible situation to me! What's going on in our
>> country? I am beginning to wonder if we do not need a new
>> Constitution. Our present one is over 200 years old. A
>> constition drafted in horse and buggy days just may not be
>> sufficient for this age of neuroscience and interplanetary
>> space travel. I wonder whether or not our short Constituion
>> which has to have almost every word of it interpreted by the
>> Supreme Court so that we can know what it says is sufficient
>> for the 21st century. What do you think? I have not made up
>> my mind on this issue, but I am really giving it some serious
>> thought. I do not like the idea that "...the Constitution is
>> what the judges say it is...." The Constitution should be
>> what the Constitution says it is. What do you think? How do
>> you feel about this?
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Hardy Parkerson, Atty.
>> Lake Charles, LA
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/18/01, JUDY DOYLE wrote:
>>> When we discovered we were living on top of stolen land
>>> that was used as a hazardous waste site, we posted
>>> statements on the front of our house such as, "CAUTION!
>>> WARNING! MCCLELLAN BURIED THEIR HAZARDOUS WASTE HERE." A
>>> couple of neighbors who wanted to sell their illegal, toxic
>>> sites without disclosure so they conspired with the county
>>> of Sacramento, California to paint over our FREE SPEECH.
>>> The county secured an inspection warrant using health and
>>> safety codes to come onto the property and paint over our
>>> free speech. When a Veterans advocate came on the crime
>>> scene, she was arrested for asking a cop if he knew what
>>> the Constitution was. The Veterans advocate is in trial
>>> this week for saying that nasty word in public. The
>>> Washington Times exposed this crime against our free speech
>>> in a June 11, 2001 article titled "Woman on trial for
>>> talking to cop". I will be testifying at her trial. I
>>> will keep you updated if you would like to know the outcome
>>> of her trial. Since this happened in California, she will
>>> probably end up going to jail.
>
>>>>> Defacto government, that's why they hate to hear the word
> constitution. A defacto government is one who maintains itself
> by a display of force against the will of the rightful legal
> government & is sucessful, at least temporayily, in overturning
> the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up
> its own in lieu thereof. (such as police power) Ever notice
> that the flags in out courtrooms have the yellow fringe now ?
> The police have yellow boarder around the flag they wear on
> their uniforms ? The Law of the Flag says that means it is a
> military court. Yet these courts call these frivolious
> lawsuits ! Why, they don't want to hear or let the public know
> what they r doing to our country. Government defacto is one
> whom is actual possession of the office or supreme power, but
> by usurpation or without lAWFUL TITLE. You hear? WITHOUT
> LAWFUL TITLE ! THEY R GETTING AWAY WITH THIS because they have
> brainless police power. Now dejure government, which is our
> constitutions, which means rightful, legitimate, just or
> constitutional. The government today is trying to overturn our
> constitutions so they can take over. Run everything by stautes
> & codes which really r unlawful. But people just don't
> understand & when they do try to defend our constitutions these
> defacto government go after them, arrest them for conspiring
> against them. The same goes for the defacto courts who are
> trying to get the Ten Commandments out of the courts. Really,
> these r our 1st laws of mankind, whom founded laws. Real laws,
> not by force. We must protect our constitutions or the future
> will be ruled by tyrants & our children & children's children
> will have to live in fear of our government, which has already
> begun to happen. Without our constitutions to protect us this
> will the worse county to live in. God Bless us all and may he
> be the last one to judge those whom did not abide to the 1st
> laws of mankind !

Re: IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO SAY 'CONSTITUTION', 2/19/04, by budman9898.

First Amendment Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST