Re: IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO SAY 'CONSTITUTION'
Posted by Hardy Parkerson, Atty., hmparkerson@bigfoot.com, on 7/11/03
Dear Judy, Yes, keep us posted on the outcome of the trial! Looks like a terrible situation to me! What's going on in our country? I am beginning to wonder if we do not need a new Constitution. Our present one is over 200 years old. A constition drafted in horse and buggy days just may not be sufficient for this age of neuroscience and interplanetary space travel. I wonder whether or not our short Constituion which has to have almost every word of it interpreted by the Supreme Court so that we can know what it says is sufficient for the 21st century. What do you think? I have not made up my mind on this issue, but I am really giving it some serious thought. I do not like the idea that "...the Constitution is what the judges say it is...." The Constitution should be what the Constitution says it is. What do you think? How do you feel about this?
Sincerely, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. Lake Charles, LA On 6/18/01, JUDY DOYLE wrote: > When we discovered we were living on top of stolen land > that was used as a hazardous waste site, we posted > statements on the front of our house such as, "CAUTION! > WARNING! MCCLELLAN BURIED THEIR HAZARDOUS WASTE HERE." A > couple of neighbors who wanted to sell their illegal, toxic > sites without disclosure so they conspired with the county > of Sacramento, California to paint over our FREE SPEECH. > The county secured an inspection warrant using health and > safety codes to come onto the property and paint over our > free speech. When a Veterans advocate came on the crime > scene, she was arrested for asking a cop if he knew what > the Constitution was. The Veterans advocate is in trial > this week for saying that nasty word in public. The > Washington Times exposed this crime against our free speech > in a June 11, 2001 article titled "Woman on trial for > talking to cop". I will be testifying at her trial. I > will keep you updated if you would like to know the outcome > of her trial. Since this happened in California, she will > probably end up going to jail.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO SAY 'CONSTITUTION', 6/18/01, by JUDY DOYLE.
- Re: IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO SAY 'CONSTITUTION', 7/11/03, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO SAY 'CONSTITUTION', 10/19/03, by KL.
- Re: IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO SAY 'CONSTITUTION', 2/19/04, by budman9898.
|