Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page

More | Report Post

I understand what you are saying. No i'm not trying to interpret the
constitution. The problem is, there are people in government that treat it
as if it were an eqasion writen by Albert Einstine. With no definitive
answer. So it needs to be analyised continually untill they have the final
answer. When there is none. If any of us make a contract to buy a car, a
house, or what ever the contract may be. Those contracts don't have to
be "understood" Torn apart, analyised before the supreme court. They are
understood period. I in my opion think they have to much power. Shouldn't
meddel in our most importent document, and twist it around, that we may be
offending someone with our laws. Simple! the majorety always ruled. Now we
have to make exceptions? Laws are made and passed because that is what the
majority of reasonable people want. I just wonder why if i can understand
it, with my limited education. What's wrong with these highly educated
individuals!??

On 12/13/06, Res ispa Loquitur wrote:
> My friend the Constitution does not tell us what our rights and freedoms
> are but rather the Supreme Court. You are trying to interpret the
> constitution literally and historicly. I wish this was the case. The
> Bill of Rights only protect individuals from the Federal government not
> the states. Further since the Civil war the "Incorporation doctrine" has
> placed the Bill of Rights into the 14th Amendment. The 14th amendment
> says right to have liberty. What does liberty mean Freedom? Free to
> own land, free to marry.... Marry what anything? Right to marry same
> sex or marry 5 women?? The Supreme court tells us what this Amendment
> says. Currently our right is to marry the opposite sex or 1 woman. But
> there is a current agenda of the homosexuals siad Scalia to push for
> freedom to marry same sex but not 5 women. So then the Supreme Court is
> was tells us what our rights are and it slides with the times.
>
> Final Answer
> Res ispa Loquitur
>
>
>
>
> On 12/12/06, v wrote:
>> How bout the constitution dosen't
>> give us our rights. The bill of
>> rights says what our rights are??
>> And as far as i know we only have
>> one right we can use. The right to
>> remain silent. Are you sure that's
>> your final answer??
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/06, Res ispa Loquitur
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are for now this is my final
>> answer. Unless I can think of
>> another
>>> legal theory to present :{
>>>
>>> On 12/12/06, Bob R/CA wrote:
>>>> On 12/11/06, Res ispa Loquitur.
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Remember peope there is NO
>> Freedom of speech! There is only
>>>>> freedom of Political speech.
>> All other speech can be and is
>>>>> regulated or restricted.
>> Anything that causes Immediate
>> passion
>>>>> hate or anger is banned.
>>>>
>>>> Is that your final answer? :o)