Re: Confidential Letter Given To The Employer
Posted by cbg on 10/16/01
On 10/16/01, ken wrote: > On 10/16/01, cbg wrote: >> On 10/15/01, Ken F. wrote: >>> I wrote a letter to the President of the Michigan Education >>> Association. This letter criticised the employer, the local >>> president and the corrupt relationship between union and >>> employer. I sent a copy of this letter to the same local >>> president and the MEA liason to the school district I work >>> in. It expected it to be put in our files. It was not >>> mailed to private residences, but only to an official union >>> office. >>> >>> This letter ended up in the possesion of the employer.The >>> employer then claims I meant the letter to be seen by the >>> superintendent. I am fired for this act of "gross >>> insubordination". The local president has denied giving >>> this letter to the employer. In any case it was not meant >>> to be seen by the employer under any circumstances. >>> >>> Is this a violation of my 1st amnendment rights? The >>> employer is saying that if an employee criticises them, >>> even through official union channels, that you are subject >>> to discipline. They are actually saying that filing a >>> grievance can be considered "insubordinate". This is much >>> to consider. >>> >>> This is the question, there is "no more to it". >> >> No. You do not have a right to free speech in the work place. >> > It wasn't in the workplace. Shows how ignorant you are, you > obviously can't read. >> >>> Okay, fine. It was regarding an employer, sent to the union office, and your employment was terminated as a result, but it wasn't in the workplace. That's okay with me.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Confidential Letter Given To The Employer, 10/15/01, by Ken F..
- Re: Confidential Letter Given To The Employer, 10/16/01, by cbg.
- Re: Confidential Letter Given To The Employer, 10/16/01, by ken.
- Re: Confidential Letter Given To The Employer, 10/16/01, by cbg.
|