Re: Did Bush Lie? Does it make any difference?

More | Report Post

Bush does have a responsibility to the American people to
tell the truth. He sent men and women to Iraq completely
based on false assumptions, even though he did have
information to the contrary. Those weapons inspectors who
would know, told Bush and the American people there was
nothing there, the I.A.E.A said there was noting there. 6
months after Bush said mission accomplished, still no WMD'S.
Bush can lie all he wants to other countries further erroding
our status around the world, but HE MAY NOT LIE TO THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE. Men and women have died for those lies. It
is wrong, it is morally bankrupt, and the President of the
United States should have the intestinal fortitude to TELL
THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.

On 7/11/03, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote:
>
>
> Dear Counsel.Net Friends,
>
> It is not fair for the Democrats to accuse President Bush
> of lying about weapons of mass destruction and about the
> Iraqis' trying to buy nuclear bomb material in Africa. So
> what! The President can lie if he wants to, especially
> when it involves matters of national security. He does not
> have to tell the enemy the truth. Don't you think that they
> watch the State of the Union and all of that. What
> difference does it make if he did tell a lie! I stand
> behind him.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Hardy Parkerson, Atty.
> Lake Charles, LA
>

Re: Did Bush Lie? Does it make any difference?, 4/03/04, by Diego Cervantez.

First Amendment Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST