Re: Did Bush Lie? Does it make any difference?

More | Report Post

On 7/11/03, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote:
>
>
> Dear Counsel.Net Friends,
>
> It is not fair for the Democrats to accuse President
Bush
> of lying about weapons of mass destruction and about the
> Iraqis' trying to buy nuclear bomb material in Africa. So
> what! The President can lie if he wants to, especially
> when it involves matters of national security. He does
not
> have to tell the enemy the truth. Don't you think that
they
> watch the State of the Union and all of that. What
> difference does it make if he did tell a lie! I stand
> behind him.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Hardy Parkerson, Atty.
> Lake Charles, LA
>

Hi. I am 13 and I know more than you. I told you my age
and I wont lie because the truth is better. It is NOT ok
for the president to lie to us. From what u have written I
can assume that you are a republican. I can also assume
that when Clinton lied it was not only fair but also right
to accuse him and denounce him all you wanted. I don’t
agree with Clinton lying under oath but lying is lying. How
can you simply say that it is OK for a country to go to war
over reasons that keep on changing? Saddam never had any
ties to any terrorist groups. The Bush Administration said
that no ties between Saddam and any terrorist groups have
been made and the only reason he would make them would be if
backed into a corner in a time of emergency or war. That
means that going to war might have actually made ties. The
president is a liar and it is not acceptable. Now this
election we need to do the most possible to end this by
voting for another candidate.

Re: Did Bush Lie? Does it make any difference?, 4/03/04, by Diego Cervantez.

First Amendment Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST