Posted by Catherine Hudson, chattymomma2003@yahoo.com, on 8/24/03

More | Report Post

my brother was arrested based on a recorded converstation
the detective on the case gained consent to record
converstation from plaintiff the converstation was
recorded with plaintiff knowledge only by the detective
not the plaintiff. My brother was not made aware of
recording of converstation Oregon is a one party state!
However federal law says that you cannot record a
converstation you are not party too. The detective was not
party to the conversation and in fact directed plaintiff
on questions to ask defendant my brother. He was arrested
as a result of this taped conversation and is faceing
major jail time. Any help would be appreciated thank you
chatty

Re: big trouble, 9/10/03, by sillyme.

First Amendment Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST