Follow us!

    Re: The Bible versus porn

    Posted by Ozarks Lawyer on 1/06/05

    So it's better to have sex that watch others have sex? Okay, I'm
    all for that. But to what legal question does this relate?

    On 1/06/05, Yinka wrote:
    > God invented sex therefore sex is good.
    > God made us responsible therefore sex has to be within certain
    > parameters. you know what they are, if you dont, read your bible.
    > porn isnt sex, it's looking at other people having sex. this is a
    > variation, a perversion, if you like, of the original plan.
    >
    > i have never read about any prophet who walked around naked, I
    > think the person who wrote that made it up (I would suggest to
    > that person that you should at least make up the name of the
    > prophet as well if you're going to make things up)
    >
    > PS: if it feels good it's a sin? who taught you that?
    >
    > On 10/06/04, Better Catholic than most of them I know. wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Sex is sin. That is why we are all born into original sin. The
    >> Bible says the sins of the fathers are visited on the children
    >> (product of the sin) for generations. If it feels good,it's a
    >> sin.
    >>
    >> Better Cathholic than most of them I know.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 10/05/04, Brandon wrote:
    >>> On 8/09/04, Anonymous wrote:
    >>>> "Why is it a republican thing to defend the Bible and
    >>>> outlaw porn; yet the democrats defend porn and hate the
    >>>> Bible??
    >>>>
    >>>> God "invented" sex and therefore anything we can enjoy
    >>>> about sex is a gift from God, (short of kiddie porn,
    >>>> beastality, rape). "
    >>>>
    >>>> Isn't it amazing that if a Republican/Christian mentions
    >>>> porn or nudity, they are automatically condemned? I think
    >>>> it is amazing that no one considers the fact that the Bible
    >>>> never condemns nudity. Shoot, there was one prophet in the
    >>>> Old Testament that was nude for 3 years straight, making a
    >>>> prophetical point. This is somehow OK, because its in the
    >>>> Bible, but if someone today walked around naked for 3 years,
    >>>> he would be considered in league with Satan.
    >>>>
    >>>> Just an observation..
    >>>>
    >>>> He also has a point about Democrats always being anti-
    >>>> Christian in their actions. You never see anyone who
    >>>> actually is a true individual anymore. Virtually everyone
    >>>> seems to fall into some group sooner or later, whether or
    >>>> not they are correct. Like lemmings.
    >>>
    >>> Hey! Nice to hear from ya. You are completely correct that
    >> the
    >>> Bible never mentions anything against nudity. But in fact it
    >>> emphatically opposes sexual imorality. It's everywhere in the
    >>> Bible. Check out Romans, for one. Anyway, the thing about
    >> porn
    >>> is this: when we view porn, we tend to has lusty thoughts
    >>> associated with it. Herein lies the problem. Lust clearly
    >>> exemplifies sexual imorality; hence, it is advised that we
    >>> lustful, sexual humans stay away from porn.
    >>> As a side note. If some person could look at porn and truly
    >>> have no lustful feelings or desirous feelings, then it would be
    >>> okay. This person would be looking at the porn like looking at
    >>> any other picture or painting.
    >>> Just keep in mind. When in doubt, consult the Bible and
    >>> conusult God himself. Remeber the power of prayer.
    >>> Thanks for the awesome question. Fly with Christ.

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • The Bible versus porn, 1/26/04, by ui_pre-law.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 8/09/04, by Anonymous .
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 10/05/04, by Brandon.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 10/06/04, by Better Catholic than most of them I know..
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 10/06/04, by v.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 1/06/05, by Yinka.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 1/06/05, by Ozarks Lawyer.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 7/31/05, by jimbob2.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 8/17/05, by Ozarks Lawyer.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 8/22/05, by Anita.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 8/22/05, by v.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 9/01/05, by scott.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 9/01/05, by Ozarks Lawyer.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 10/14/05, by Don.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 10/14/05, by John.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 10/14/05, by John.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 10/25/05, by George.
  • Re: The Bible versus porn, 2/21/06, by emmanuel.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.