Posted by Skye on 10/14/05

More | Report Post

ohhh the pain these unconstitutional laws are causing on me
and many thousands of good people across the country. How
can the government pass a law such as the lautenberg
amendment keeping guns away from a person because of a d.v.
conviction? I plead guilty to one in 1994 while I was on a
police force, which I resigned in 01/96. I applied in
another state and they informed me they could not hire me
due to the new law. Is this new law not an ex-post facto
law when it comes to someone like me who was convicted
prior to the law. I know the Supreme court said it is not
an ex-post facto law since you aren't being punished for
the original crime only owning a weapon (a felony. Well it
would not be a felony nor a crime if it had not been for
the prior conviction, so then isnt this an ex=post facto
law? If so, how the heck can they get awy with it, and why
do we let them?

the pain, 10/14/05, by Skye.

Second Amendment Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST