Re: Does anyone read this? TO CHRIS

More | Report Post

On 8/21/06, Chris wrote:
> On 8/21/06, Steven wrote:
>> On 8/09/06, Carol wrote:
>>> On 8/09/06, Chris wrote:
>>>> On 8/09/06, M'sta Mikey wrote:
>>>>> On 8/08/06, Me wrote:
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep.
>>>>
>>>> Good. Thought I was alone here.
>>> Chris and OP-me, whom I assume is also Chris: perhaps you have
>>> not gotten responses due to the nature of this board: "Welcome
>>> to the Second Amendment Chatboard. This forum is dedicated to
>>> academic discussions related to gun control and the right to
>>> bear arms as specified under the Second Amendment of the US
>>> Constitution. Please bookmark this resource and contribute
>>> often. If you have any questions related to this resource,
>>> please email webmaster@counsel.net. "
>>> I see nothing that comes close to an academic discussion by
>>> posting links to petitions. You are not discussing anything,you
>>> are simply pushing a political agenda that most of us are not
>>> inclined to become involved in. There are many, many other
>>> sites to from which you may much more easily recruit.
>>
>> Chris, you are more than welcome to post your thoughts and
> opinions
>> on this matter. I for one am right there with you. Do not just
> copy
>> and paste to this board, please write what you have to say. There
>> are many of us here who feel exactly the way you do about this
>> unconstitutional law. I for oine feel that all of those who voted
>> to pass this ex-post-facto law should be brought up on charges of
>> treason. They violated many article of the U.S. Consitution
>> especially the oath they took to uphold the Constitution, yet here
>> we are with a law passed that should never have been. Spread the
>> word Chris, don't let anyone stop yopu from doing that. I signed
>> your petition, hope it goes somewhere. I wrote my representative a
>> seven page letter, but have not heard anything form him. This man
>> is on the newly formed committee to uphold the second amendment.
> Go
>> figure huh.
>
> I did not feel as anyone was keeping me from writing on this board.
> I spammed the board with a link and I was told so. No hard feelings.
>
> As for the Lautenberg Amendment, if anyone thinks this law is about
> stopping domestic assault and not about stripping America of their
> right to bear arms, you may be wrong. I feel as though Myself and
> millions of Americans are being deprived of a Constitutional Right,
> for a misdemeanor crime of violence, that did not have to involve
> violence at all.
>
> How can our Congress vote on an Amendment that will change the very
> way the Constitution is interpreted, without many even being aware
> it was included in a huge spending Bill?
>

I think so to. Changing the laws by our represenitives, who don't seem
to represent the people who voted them into office, is not good academic
discussion?? Is this why America is in the toilet? Some body out there
is waiting to flush. I'm the Captain of my own ship. I do not want to
get flushed when the rats pull the handle. I'll go down with my ship,
thank you! One last thought. Remember come voting time, know who the
good senators and congrassman are. We can flush the toilet on them, and
get rid of the crap.

> I think the Supreme Court should revisit this issue on the basis of
> its violation of the Constitution of the United States of
> America.
>
>