Re: Denied Illinois FOID card

More | Report Post

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/95/SB/09500SB1094enr.htm

ILLINOIS FOID CARD ACT AT THIS WEBSITE

On 3/12/08, ILLINOIS wrote:
> I was told by the Illinois State police that they declined my FOID card because the Coles county Sheriffs department used information
> apparently from my divorce case two years ago; Information my wife lied about in court with no proof and that I was posting things on
> these types of websites they felt was confirming my mental state. I went back and read everything I have wrote and I see nothing any where
> that I threaten anyone or shows I am crazy, lots of people post stuff. I have been posting things about my views on the Illinois Laws and
> the constitution, why is that a crime now in Illinois anyone know? One other thing my firearms had never been fired, owned them for 15
> years, no criminal record anywhere in the world, also I have no mental recorded stating I am crazy, nor a court saying it. The sheriffs
> department seized them without a warrant and affidavit like the Illinois Constitution states you need. What’s going on here anyone know? I
> do know this deputy sheriff doesn’t like me, and he’s the one who compiled the information to send to the State Police. Its not the
> Illinois State polices fault there just doing their job with Information they got from this Deputy sheriff that is playing medical doctor
> and judge on the side..
>
>
> On 3/01/08, Illinois wrote:
>> Illinois is the leader in taking away your rights. What’s next, will Illinois demand you put the 666 chips under skin for idefication
> and
>> tracking purposes? My opinion as I look at what Illinois legislators are trying to do is break Illinois away from the constitution and
>> the United States to form their own little country. Illinois makes you have a licenses for everything, fishing, hunting, drivers,
>> firearms, etc, they also make grown adults were a seat belt in their own car and if you don’t want to go to jury duty, you go to jail.
>> Illinois the communist State love or leave it, I guess. I am trying to leave it and return to the rest of the United States again, where
>> state officials follow the constitution.
>>
>> On 2/29/08, -- wrote:
>>> On 2/29/08, Guns wrote:
>>>> Anti-gun Bills Poised to be Heard at Any Moment in the Illinois House!
>>>>
>>>> In the Illinois State House there are six bills that are aimed at weakening your Second Amendment rights.
>>>>
>>>> House Bill 731 would expand the current mandatory storage law and make it virtually impossible for law-abiding gun owners to store a
>>>> firearm in a way that would leave it readily accessible for self-defense;
>>>>
>>>> House Bill 758 would create a virtual ban on the private transfer of firearms;
>>>>
>>>> House Bill 796 would create a new state-based licensing bureaucracy for firearm dealers;
>>>>
>>>> House Bill 4357 would ban countless semi-automatic firearms and .50 cal. rifles and ammunition;
>>>>
>>>> House Bill 4393 would place a limit on the number of handguns an individual may lawfully purchase;
>>>>
>>>> Finally, Senate Bill 1007 would ban the manufacture, possession, delivery, sale, and purchase of standard capacity ammunition
>>>> magazines capable of holding more than ten (10) cartridges. This bill is worded so broadly that it would also ban certain firearms,
>>>> such as some Henry rifles, which have attached tubular magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition. This lever-
>>>> action rifle, whose design dates back to the 1860s, could be prohibited under SB 1007, making this bill far more than a magazine ban.
>>>
>>> If the US Supreme Court decides in favor of Heller in "D.C. v. Heller" the proposed bills you have copied above will be dead in the
>>> water whether they pass or not. What these bill try to do is exactly what "Heller" is going to decide.
>>>
>>> Here’s the questions presented in Heller:
>>>
>>> Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code §§ 7.2502.02(a)(4) [banning handguns], 22-4504(a) [banning gun carrying, including at
>>> home], and 7.2507.02 [requiring all guns to be both unloaded and locked or disassembled] — violate the Second Amendment rights of
>>> individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use
>>> in their homes?
>>>
>>> (1) Does the Second Amendment protect a right of individuals?
>>>
>>> (2) If so, do individuals enjoy that right regardless of whether they are currently affiliated with a state-regulated militia
>>> organization?
>>>
>>> (3) If so, then what purposes, of the various purposes for which individuals may wish to keep or bear arms, are constitutionally
>>> protected?
>>>