ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Second Amendment Chatboard


Hot Now...
• Attorney Chat Center
• Attorney Classifieds
• Attorney Chatboards
• Practice Areas
• Law Students
Most Popular
• Set Your Quick Links
• Chat Center
• All Chatboards
• Classified Ads

Re: Denied Illinois FOID card
Posted by DILLER on 9/28/07

    The public better wake up, if they wont to keep their guns, there is a
    war going on in the government right now. Non-American politicians are
    doing there very best to have them removed from your home. Illinois
    foid cards are just the first step in a process to take them away. Foid
    cards in my opinion violate the United States Constitution. You have a
    right to bare arms and shall not be infringed; it says nothing about
    firearm identification cards, or any other requirement. Stop them from
    dismantling the Constitution.


    On 8/23/07, PA wrote:
    > I wouldn’t put it past republicans, nor would I put it past Illinois
    > Judicial Inquiry Board to let Schick slide through the system as a
    > favor to a friend. Take a look at what’s going on with Former
    > Republican Governor George Ryan. He should have been put in prison a
    > long time ago, but with political helpers, he is still not serving
    > his sentence for racketeering and fraud. Any other common citizen
    > would be behind bars right now. I think the point this Hogan guy is
    > trying to make is that; this Schick fellow broke the law when he
    > didn’t give him a hearing, before they took his guns. I read the
    > Illinois law and it dose say that he is entitled to a hearing first
    > before they can confiscate those guns; there is no question about
    > that. As far as the Constitution goes, Illinois has adopted those
    > same rules under the second amendment in the Illinois constitution,
    > so the right to bare arms has been infringed. You need to get the FBI
    > to investigate this crime against you; he shouldn’t be allowed to
    > escape from committing a crime against your rights.
    >
    > On 8/22/07, JR wrote:
    >> 08/22/2007 Your case may involve a federal question, thus you may
    >> be able to file a federal suit against the Judge personally or
    >> maybe the TRO state law has not been constitutionally tested yet.
    >> If you can show that the judge violated your constitutional or
    >> civil rights, or that he discriminated against you for some other
    >> reason "under the color of law". Maybe the TRO law in your state
    >> is unconstitutional as written or in the way it's dicriminately
    >> applied.
    >>
    >> It's relatively cheap to file a federal suit, if you represent
    >> yourself "pro se". But you have to know what your doing. You
    >> should consult a local attorney about the specifics about your
    >> case. Note that Judges will frequently violate the procedures of
    >> even their own states TRO statutes, rules and procedures, because
    >> they can and because few people truely challenge them, but file a
    >> federal suit and you'll get their attention, but you won't make
    >> any friends. Consult a local attorney.
    >>
    >> As far as buying a firearm, rifle, pistol or shotgun. Unless there
    >> is a current/present Protection/Restraining Order (TRO) against
    >> you, you may or not pass the Brady background check as the
    >> previous writer indicates. Either way, many states provide for
    >> private firearms purchases, this may be legal in your case and in
    >> your state, consult a local attorney for legal advise.
    >>
    >> If the judge has committed some sort of "Ethics" violation while
    >> adjudicating your case, you may be able to file a complaint with
    >> the state bar association. Exp. while a judge probably does not
    >> have to provide you information about how you should not proceed
    >> in you case, if cannot "lie to you", mislead or provide you false
    >> information. Consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction.
    >>
    >> On 8/22/07, -- wrote:
    >>> You will never get anywhere with your judicial conspiracy theory-
    >>> -it makes you sound paranoid. Just reapply and see what
    >>> happens, that is the best way to challenge a denial. You should
    >>> go to a local gun shop and try to buy a cheap hand gun. If you
    >>> are denied you will be given the opportunity to discover the
    >>> reason and challenge the denial. See 28 CFR 25.1 If you
    >>> currently have a TRO or past domestic violence charge you will
    >>> not be able to legally own a gun--don't even try.
    >>>
    >>> BTW The second amendment to the US Constitution does not apply
    >>> to states. States may enact whatever gun control they see fit
    >>> to. It's possible a state could ban guns altogether but that has
    >>> never been tested.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On 8/22/07, Hogan wrote:
    >>>> Here is my update on Judge Mitchell K Schick of the Coles
    >>>> county court house in Charleston Illinois. Nothing that I know
    >>>> has happen to this judge yet he is still judging people, but I
    >>>> am still hoping that somebody dose there job in the government
    >>>> and will do something about this crime against my rights. I
    >>>> found out yesterday that Tony William is the Illinois Judicial
    >>>> Inquiry Board chair and legal member; he is from Charleston
    >>>> Illinois, born and raised there and he attended school at
    >>>> Eastern Illinois University in Charleston Illinois. Mitchell K
    >>>> Schick is from Charleston and both men have practice law as
    >>>> lawyers in this area. Tony Williams’s son Rick works for the
    >>>> Judicial Inquiry Board as well. There are other members from
    >>>> the board that have gone to school close to Charleston at the
    >>> U
    >>>> of I. I would say that that it is quite weird that the Board
    >>>> refused to do anything to judge Mitchell K Schick, even though
    >>>> I had solid evidence and presented the law to them. They even
    >>>> wrote me back and said that they wouldn’t give me a reason
    >>> why,
    >>>> but they did say that they were not saying that my case did
    >>> not
    >>>> have merit, just that they were considering the case closed.
    >>> So
    >>>> you tell me, dose this all sound strange to you? I can’t
    >>>> believe that Schick and Williams do not know each other, if
    >>> you
    >>>> consider they both have ties to Charleston Illinois. All I am
    >>>> saying is this is very strange if you ask me.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 6/13/07, NRA MAN wrote:
    >>>>> All I can tell you is that, There are People in the
    >>>>> government that want to take guns away from the common
    >>>>> person. Are rights are beinging violated by these government
    >>>>> crooks. Read this: Republican Judge Mitchell K. Schick of the
    >>>>> Coles county court house in Charleston illinois, has
    >>>>> illegally violated general assembly law 14.5 (a) concerning
    >>>>> firearms; he has violated Illinois, and federal
    >>>>> constitutional laws and his oath to protect the constitution,
    >>>>> which is an act of treason. I have notified the Fbi of this
    >>>>> matter. Judge Shick is trying to cover this matter up, hoping
    >>>>> it will go away. I have solid evedince documentaion from the
    >>>>> Court house, that provides the proof that he illegally seized
    >>>>> my two guns without having any reason to do this illegal act.
    >>>>> I had no criminal recored anywhere recorded, and he gave me
    >>>>> no trial to defend myself in court stated by the law. Judge
    >>>>> Mitchell Schick took them before I even had the chance to
    >>>>> show up for my court date to defend myself, which is a
    >>>>> violation of 14.5 (a) Illinois law. He ordered this action to
    >>>>> seize my guns violating every law written to protect the
    >>>>> common citezen. Judge Shick is working above the law, and
    >>>>> must be accountable for his actions.

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.