Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns
Posted by Paul Tyler on 1/14/08
On 1/13/08, v wrote: > Very good, very insightfull. Eye opening to say the least. To the responder's > as questionair's. > So no more reporting by the VA. Very good. Now since there has been no court > order? by the feds to remove all those listed on their report cards. Do you > tink the F.B.I. will destroy all those records? On their own without being > orderd to do so. You can count on it that those records will remain regardless > of if they can be used, or not. > It's hard for those agencys to part with information they have gatherd, that > is so valuable in so many ways. Nice to have rights restored. Also nice to NOT > have your name stored in a govrnmt. data base somwhere. Benien as it may seem. > > > On 1/13/08, -- wrote: >> On 1/13/08, Paul Tyler wrote: >>> And finally, how do you interpret a court decision/order? What do you >>> mean by this? >> >> Involuntary commitment by court order. This will not include a 48 hour >> involuntary commitment for evaluation initiated by police, family or other >> non-judicial means unless it results in a court ordered commitment beyond >> 48 hrs. If you are found to be a danger to self or society and ordered by >> a court to be committed until fit for release, that is a decision/order. >> >> Also, an involuntary commitment by a court to a drug/alcohol treatment >> program will likely be seen as a decision/order. If you voluntarily >> commit yourself and are there after diagnosed as a danger to self or >> society you can be reported to NICS. >> >> What the 2007 Act seems to change is the reporting by a government agency >> of an individual because of a diagnosis not confirmed by court order or >> made during the course of a voluntary commitment to a hospital. In other >> words; if a VA shrink says your nuts in his medical records and you >> receive benefits but the shrink does not seek an involuntary commitment, a >> government agency shall not submit that info to NICS. >> >> However, the Act does not appear to prohibit private shrinks from making >> such reports. So if you see a private shrink you may be reported to >> NICS. This Act does not apply to state requirements such as the Illinois >> FOID card. A state is free to set its own standards for firearm permits. >> Even though you are OK on NICS you may still be denied by state law. I agree with you wholeheartedly. But I will conclude in this matter!
Thank you for your response herein.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 11/15/07, by Paul Tyler.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by Garrett Anderson.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by Garrett Anderson.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by Prairie Dawg.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by Paul Tyler.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by Paul Tyler.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by --.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by Paul Tyler.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by --.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/12/08, by Paul Tyler.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/13/08, by Prairie Dawg.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/13/08, by Paul Tyler.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/13/08, by --.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/13/08, by Paul Tyler.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/13/08, by --.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/13/08, by v.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/14/08, by Paul Tyler.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/14/08, by Prairie Dawg.
- Re: VA has denied "Veterans" the right to own guns, 1/14/08, by Paul Tyler.
|