Post: unconstitutional
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ab77/7ab77609ea50f381c51b773802d8ee9c313a8f7c" alt=""
Posted by Stewart on 11/20/07
The Lautenberg Amendment sounds to me to violate many amendments of the U.S Constitution. What does everyone think? What can we do as citizens to get this law recended so we citizens can have our rights back. I mean what if you plead guilty in 1994 to D.V and then this law comes around 3 years later, would you have plead guilty if you knew this waa coming? They say that this amandment is not an ex post facto law because you are not being punished again for the crime. But if not for the original crime, they could not keep you from a fire arm. So this law does bounce off the original charge, thus making it ex post facto. Why can't judges see this?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- unconstitutional, 11/20/07, by Stewart.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/20/07, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/20/07, by Stewart.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/20/07, by --.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/22/07, by Stewart.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by --.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by Stewart.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by --.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by --.
- Re: unconstitutional (more info), 11/24/07, by --.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/24/07, by Stewart.
- Re: unconstitutional, 11/25/07, by v.
|