ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Second Amendment Chatboard

Hot Now...
Attorney Chat Center
Attorney Classifieds
Attorney Chatboards
Practice Areas
Law Students
Most Popular
Set Your Quick Links
Chat Center
All Chatboards
Classified Ads

Post: unconstitutional

Posted by Stewart on 11/20/07

    The Lautenberg Amendment sounds to me to violate many
    amendments of the U.S Constitution. What does everyone
    think? What can we do as citizens to get this law recended
    so we citizens can have our rights back. I mean what if you
    plead guilty in 1994 to D.V and then this law comes around
    3 years later, would you have plead guilty if you knew this
    waa coming? They say that this amandment is not an ex post
    facto law because you are not being punished again for the
    crime. But if not for the original crime, they could not
    keep you from a fire arm. So this law does bounce off the
    original charge, thus making it ex post facto. Why can't
    judges see this?

Posts on this thread, including this one

  • unconstitutional, 11/20/07, by Stewart.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/20/07, by Curmudgeon.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/20/07, by Stewart.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/20/07, by --.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/22/07, by Stewart.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by --.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by Curmudgeon.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by Stewart.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by Curmudgeon.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by --.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/23/07, by --.
  • Re: unconstitutional (more info), 11/24/07, by --.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/24/07, by Stewart.
  • Re: unconstitutional, 11/25/07, by v.

    •  
       

     
    Google
     
    Web Counsel.Net
      Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
      © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.