Follow us!

    Re: Help! Im doing a debate on gun control and need info.

    Posted by gkw on 2/28/03

    A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a
    free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall
    not be infringed.

    Twenty-seven words. One sentence. But, oh the consternation
    these words have caused throughout our country during the last
    half-century. They are, of course, the words of the Second
    amendment to the constitution of the United States of America,
    one of ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights.

    Originally, there were twelve amendments proposed at the
    constitutional convention, but two were rejected, and the
    remaining ten were adopted as a single body. They were,
    actually, a compromise reached between men, such as James
    Madison and Alexander Hamilton, who believed in a strong
    centralized government and others like Patrick Henry, and Samuel
    Bryan, who believed that state governments offered the best
    protection for personal liberties.

    The constitution is very specific about what it requires, and
    allows the Federal Government to do. By its very
    nature(specificity), it is a limiting document.

    The Bill of Rights is a limiting document within that document
    that provides additional protection of personal liberties.

    It is interesting that, of the ten amendments, the 2nd is the
    only one which has been consistently attacked, and had numerous
    attempts to narrow its meaning and purpose, while the others
    have been left unscathed or even expanded in their application.

    For example:
    The 1st amendment, having originally been devised to protect
    political dissension, and protest has been expanded to allow
    types of speech and behavior that throughout our country's
    history have been believed to immoral, or at the very least
    inappropriate.

    The 4th, was constructed to protect citizens against
    unreasonable searches and seizures of houses and effects, but
    has been expanded to espouse a "right to privacy".

    So, why all the hue and cry about the right of citizens to keep
    and bear arms? It seems to stem from two sources;

    Those who just have an innate fear of guns, and those who
    believe that prohibiting gun ownership is a panacea to solving
    violence and violent crimes. To this end they are constantly
    demanding more and more gun control laws.

    Just last year, the Institute for Legislative Action, a legal
    arm of the National Rifle Association, reported that there are
    currently more than 22,000 gun laws in the United States.
    22,000! How many laws do they think it will take?
    Unfortunately, gun control laws, like most others, are only as
    affective as their obedience quotient. Criminals, by their very
    nature, will willingly break gun laws to get guns to commit
    crimes.

    Since the 4th amendment has been expanded to include a right to
    privacy, it seems to me that a citizen certainly has the right
    to defend himself from any and all attacks against him, his
    family, or his property.

    The 2nd amendment is the most powerful of the amendments and is
    the foundation on which the others rest.

    After all, what good is a "right to free speech" if you cannot
    defend yourself from those that wish to silence you? What use
    is a so-called right to privacy if you cannot defend yourself
    from those who would invade your home?

    It is this amendment, and this amendment alone that allows
    citizens to physically and forcibly protect themselves not only
    from criminals, but also from the abuse or abrogation of the
    other amendments, either by individuals, or Government.

    Remember, if guns are outlawed, only outlaws, and Government
    officials will have guns.

    Having just broken free from an oppressive and abusive,
    Government, it is patently obvious that the framers of the
    constitution recognized the need for citizens to be able to rise
    up against any government that was becoming too intrusive and
    powerful, and to that end, they provided for the ability of
    citizens to arm themselves as an important aspect of our basic
    rights.

    On 2/28/03, Amy wrote:
    > i'm doing a debate on Gun control and i would like some
    > informations. Gun Control: Would it help i'm against it
    > please help thanks

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Help!!!! Im doing a debate on gun control and need info., 5/16/01, by Amanda.
  • Re: Help!!!! Im doing a debate on gun control and need info., 8/24/01, by Dick Brudzynski.
  • Re: Help!!!! Im doing a debate on gun control and need info., 8/27/02, by W. Reid Ripley.
  • Re: Help!!!! Im doing a debate on gun control and need info., 2/28/03, by Amy.
  • Re: Help! Im doing a debate on gun control and need info., 2/28/03, by gkw.
  • Re: Help!!!! Im doing a debate on gun control and need info., 12/23/03, by dan dougherty.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.