Follow us!

    Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives

    Posted by rrr on 10/31/02

    Are Palistinians allowed to carry guns?

    On 10/31/02, Shmuel Goldstein wrote:
    > My thesis: Repeal the 2nd Amendment.
    >
    > I live in Israel. The so-called West Bank, to be precise.
    Here in Israel, we
    > do not have a 2nd Amendment, and no one here has a "right"
    to bear arms.
    >
    > There are basically three ways in which your average
    Israeli citizen can/does
    > use arms: 1) He can acquire a license, then buy the weapon,
    2) Work for the
    > Police or other security agency, 3) Do reserve duty
    >
    > Now, just about every man does reserve duty, and typically
    the weapon used is
    > an Uzi, M-16, or perhaps a Galil, which handles like an AK-
    47, and uses M-16
    > size bullets.
    >
    > In addition, reservists and regular army soldiers are all
    over the country, and
    > it is de riguer to see a 19 y/o soldier get on a bus with
    an M-16 strapped
    > around his shoulder. No one thinks anything of it. In fact,
    there have been
    > several incidents where one of these guys was near a
    suicide bomber and stopped
    > him by shooting him.
    >
    > In order for a regular citizen to acquire a weapon, say, a
    pistol, he must
    > undergo security checks, medical checks, and police checks.
    It is not a given
    > that he will receive a license for the weapon. Basically,
    if he was an IDF
    > officer, a cop, or if he lives in a dangerous area (the
    gov't decides what is
    > dangerous, and they make logical decisions, believe me), he
    can get the
    > license. Then he's got to go to an approved dealer to buy
    the gun. Then he must
    > do monthly target practice or risk having his license
    revoked, and the weapon,
    > which could cost hundreds of dollars, confiscated.
    >
    > I remind you, that this is ISRAEL, which is undergoing a
    cruel war of attrition
    > right now.
    >
    > Gunshot and violent crimes here are much more rare then
    they are in the US.
    > Part of the reason is that a weapon is hard to get. Part of
    the reason, indeed,
    > is cultural.
    >
    > Before the OSLO accords, signed in 1993, Palestinian
    violence was primarily
    > rocks being thrown, and the occasional bigger attack. Since
    the accords were
    > signed, and more to the point, since the Palestinian police
    were given weapons
    > by the Israelis, my children must go to school in BULLET-
    PROOF buses. The
    > Palestinians use the weapons freely against us, and even
    use them at weddings -
    > firing in the air in "celebration".
    >
    > An Israeli is VERY careful with the weapon he either has
    bought, or was issued
    > for his reserve duty. He must fill out a report and undergo
    sometimes grueling
    > interrogations by the Police (or the MP's) if he fires the
    weapon.
    >
    > Many people where I live walk around with pistols in their
    belts, and/or the
    > Uzi or M-16. These are simple civilian residents of a
    Jewish village in
    > Samaria (aka West Bank). These people have the weapons
    legally. In fact, the
    > attack just a few days ago in Harmesh was stopped by people
    with such weapons.
    >
    > Israel can be considered the valhalla for those who love
    guns.
    >
    > BUT
    >
    > There is no 2nd Amendment, and there is no "right" to bear
    arms.
    >
    > In the US, there is no "right" to drive, yet millions do.
    > There is no "right" to be a doctor, yet there are many.
    > There is no "right" to fly, yet there are many pilots.
    > There is no "right" to be a pharmacist and sell potentially
    deadly drugs, yet
    > many are pharmacists.
    > There is no "right" to be a prostitute, and in fact, it is
    illegal in most
    > places, EXCEPT certain areas of Nevada.
    >
    > In short, if the 2nd Amendment is repealed, each State and
    locality can then
    > set the weapons-use issue according to the customs and
    mores of its own
    > people. Even if there is no "right" to bear arms, this does
    not mean that guns
    > will be taken away from people. It only means that they
    could (but not
    > necessarily will) be monitored much more closely, which I
    think will only help
    > to reduce violent crime.
    >
    > Just my thoughts,
    >
    > Shmuel
    >

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • 2nd Amendment perspectives, 10/31/02, by Shmuel Goldstein.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 10/31/02, by rrr.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 12/07/02, by sharwinston.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 12/16/02, by Shmuel.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 12/16/02, by Shmuel.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 5/04/03, by shawn.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 5/04/03, by your perspective is flawed..
  • Re: 2nd Amendment
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 11/02/03, by Kelvin.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 11/23/03, by Joel Clyde.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 12/13/03, by Ravage.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 3/18/04, by Alex.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 2/10/05, by Shmuel Goldstein.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.