Post: Lautenberg Amendment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ab77/7ab77609ea50f381c51b773802d8ee9c313a8f7c" alt=""
Posted by Steven on 12/05/03
I have applied to the U.S. Army and was turned down due to a domestic violence charge over three years ago. All elements of the Lautenberg Amendment must apply for a person to be considered as having a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The last element states that "the conviction has not been expunged or set aside or the convicted offender has not been pardoned for the offense or had civil rights restored, unless the pardon, expungement or restoration of civil rights provides ...." In a recent Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michgian at Grand Rapids, it was ruled that with the successful completion of probationary sentence the defendant is no longer considered ineligible to possess a firearm under the stated provision. I alerted the Army to this and they stated that they needed an "official copy of a court order to determine its impact upon the applicant". It also stated that restoration of civil rights does not necessarily equate to no conviction under Lautenberg. They also state that they need a dismissal of the case. How does a case get dismissed after 3 years and all fines and probations have been completed? Please advise.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Lautenberg Amendment, 12/05/03, by Steven .
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 12/08/03, by Prairie Dawg.
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 12/18/03, by Feminist At Large.
- Re: Heyyyyyy, F.A.L., 12/19/03, by Prairie Dawg.
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 2/14/04, by Mantrove.
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 1/27/05, by jeremy.
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 2/14/05, by pw.
|