Re: Heyyyyyy, F.A.L.

More | Report Post

You sound like my kinda cynic...and your initials are the same
as a mighty fine rifle.
Take a look at my rhyme on the legal questions board
titled "The Honest Fool"

On 12/18/03, Feminist At Large wrote:
>
> Oh, Cry, now you can't serve under a man who doesn't know
> what the hell he's saying when he says it. Boo-hoo. Look on
> the bright side, now you have more time to beat your wife
> and children while collecting welfare dollars and supporting
> the U.S. beer companies.
>
> On 12/05/03, Steven wrote:
>> I have applied to the U.S. Army and was turned down due to
>> a domestic violence charge over three years ago. All
>> elements of the Lautenberg Amendment must apply for a
>> person to be considered as having a misdemeanor crime of
>> domestic violence. The last element states that "the
>> conviction has not been expunged or set aside or the
>> convicted offender has not been pardoned for the offense
> or
>> had civil rights restored, unless the pardon, expungement
>> or restoration of civil rights provides ...."
>>
>> In a recent Appeal from the United States District Court
>> for the Western District of Michgian at Grand Rapids, it
>> was ruled that with the successful completion of
>> probationary sentence the defendant is no longer
> considered
>> ineligible to possess a firearm under the stated
>> provision.
>>
>> I alerted the Army to this and they stated that they
> needed
>> an "official copy of a court order to determine its impact
>> upon the applicant". It also stated that restoration of
>> civil rights does not necessarily equate to no conviction
>> under Lautenberg. They also state that they need a
>> dismissal of the case.
>>
>> How does a case get dismissed after 3 years and all fines
>> and probations have been completed?
>>
>> Please advise.
>>

Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 2/14/05, by pw.

Second Amendment Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST