Re: Lautenberg Amendment
Posted by pw on 2/14/05
Could someone please post Attorney Tom Johnson's address or phone number? On 1/27/05, jeremy wrote: > On 12/05/03, Steven wrote: >> I have applied to the U.S. Army and was turned down due to >> a domestic violence charge over three years ago. All >> elements of the Lautenberg Amendment must apply for a >> person to be considered as having a misdemeanor crime of >> domestic violence. The last element states that "the >> conviction has not been expunged or set aside or the >> convicted offender has not been pardoned for the offense or >> had civil rights restored, unless the pardon, expungement >> or restoration of civil rights provides ...." >> >> In a recent Appeal from the United States District Court >> for the Western District of Michgian at Grand Rapids, it >> was ruled that with the successful completion of >> probationary sentence the defendant is no longer considered >> ineligible to possess a firearm under the stated >> provision. >> >> I alerted the Army to this and they stated that they needed >> an "official copy of a court order to determine its impact >> upon the applicant". It also stated that restoration of >> civil rights does not necessarily equate to no conviction >> under Lautenberg. They also state that they need a >> dismissal of the case. >> >> How does a case get dismissed after 3 years and all fines >> and probations have been completed? >> >> Please advise. > > i was already in the military when i got a dis. conduct and > didnt know about this at all. 7 years later still in the > guards and i get a letter that says if i dont get this > expunged or reduced i will be discharged within 120 days! > after getting a lawyer i was able to fix the conviction. > call tom johnson in new london, wi - seriously he helped me >>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Lautenberg Amendment, 12/05/03, by Steven .
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 12/08/03, by Prairie Dawg.
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 12/18/03, by Feminist At Large.
- Re: Heyyyyyy, F.A.L., 12/19/03, by Prairie Dawg.
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 2/14/04, by Mantrove.
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 1/27/05, by jeremy.
- Re: Lautenberg Amendment, 2/14/05, by pw.
|