Re: Is putting nuts away still a good idea?
Posted by v on 3/15/05
Ain't that what Hitler said? On 3/14/05, PV wrote: > I heard these arguments against guns on another message > board. They seem logical to me. > "Keeping and using arms just keeps political brawls going. > Look at most of Africa for example. They do just what you > say--they fight to protect their homes, families, land, > whatever. But it never gets settled and there's perpetual > slaughter and unrest. It keeps Care and Unicef, etc. very > busy. > > "If America has experienced relative peace, as has the rest > of the democratic world, it is because they have put the > guns down and have set up a system for everyone to address > and resolve problems in a fair and civilized way. It's > called creating checks and balances; establishing balance > of power. And our liberty, dear fellow, is not derived from > having a bigger gun with more bells and whistles. Our > liberty is in law . We settle our disputes in a civilized > way on the courtroom floor or the legislative floor--but we > are smart enough to leave the guns out of it. > > "As soon as you pick up the gun instead, well--might as > well move to Mogadishu where you'll fit right in. Then you > too can keep the need for relief organizations going, and > expect you and yours to live a much shorter lifespan with > nothing resolved politically." > > "Natural rights are something that you have because you are > a human being. I don't think that there is a natural right > to bear arms. > > " 'It is interesting to note that the right to arms (either > linked or divorced from duty in a militia) formed no part > of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man > promulgated by revolutionary France in 1789, and that it > forms no part of the United Nation's Universal Declaration > of Human Rights or the European Convention for the > Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms > today.'(The Militia and the Right to Arms or How The Second > Amendment Fell Silent, chapter 7 endnote 34) > > "So the French, the UN, and the European Convention haven't > recognized that a right to bear arms exists." > http://p078.ezboard.com/fguncontrol47 78frm18 > > 200 years ago people had muskets and it was hard to mass > murder people with those. But now people have machine guns > because the AWB was repealed so you have problems with mass > murder. Times have changed.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Is gun ownership still a good idea? , 3/14/05, by PV.
- Re: Is putting nuts away still a good idea? , 3/15/05, by v.
- Re: Is putting nuts away still a good idea? , 5/02/05, by czne.
- Re: Is gun ownership still a good idea? , 7/27/07, by Bub-by Civil Rights.
|