Re: Is putting nuts away still a good idea?
Posted by czne on 5/02/05
I love how everyone that is against the AWB being repealed
states that machine guns will now be available on the street
for purchase by the common man! Please check your laws and
become educated before you make up a response. Machine guns
have always required a special permit before, during, and
after the assault weapons ban. All the AWB was designed to
accomplish was appease the anti-gun liberals that would like
to see all guns banned. The real only difference now is that
the pre-ban AR-15's are now cheaper, and I can now buy an AR-
15 with a bayonet lug so that it can be used in a drive-by
bayonetting. Please, before you get on a soapbox, educate
yourself so that you are at least putting the right
information out there. THanks
On 3/15/05, v wrote:
>
> Ain't that what Hitler said?
>
>
> On 3/14/05, PV wrote:
>> I heard these arguments against
> guns on another message
>> board. They seem logical to me.
>> "Keeping and using arms just keeps
> political brawls going.
>> Look at most of Africa for
> example. They do just what you
>> say--they fight to protect their
> homes, families, land,
>> whatever. But it never gets
> settled and there's perpetual
>> slaughter and unrest. It keeps
> Care and Unicef, etc. very
>> busy.
>>
>> "If America has experienced
> relative peace, as has the rest
>> of the democratic world, it is
> because they have put the
>> guns down and have set up a system
> for everyone to address
>> and resolve problems in a fair and
> civilized way. It's
>> called creating checks and
> balances; establishing balance
>> of power. And our liberty, dear
> fellow, is not derived from
>> having a bigger gun with more
> bells and whistles. Our
>> liberty is in law . We settle our
> disputes in a civilized
>> way on the courtroom floor or the
> legislative floor--but we
>> are smart enough to leave the guns
> out of it.
>>
>> "As soon as you pick up the gun
> instead, well--might as
>> well move to Mogadishu where
> you'll fit right in. Then you
>> too can keep the need for relief
> organizations going, and
>> expect you and yours to live a
> much shorter lifespan with
>> nothing resolved politically."
>>
>> "Natural rights are something that
> you have because you are
>> a human being. I don't think that
> there is a natural right
>> to bear arms.
>>
>> " 'It is interesting to note that
> the right to arms (either
>> linked or divorced from duty in a
> militia) formed no part
>> of the Universal Declaration of
> the Rights of Man
>> promulgated by revolutionary
> France in 1789, and that it
>> forms no part of the United
> Nation's Universal Declaration
>> of Human Rights or the European
> Convention for the
>> Protection of Human Rights and
> Fundamental Freedoms
>> today.'(The Militia and the Right
> to Arms or How The Second
>> Amendment Fell Silent, chapter 7
> endnote 34)
>>
>> "So the French, the UN, and the
> European Convention haven't
>> recognized that a right to bear
> arms exists."
>>
> http://p078.ezboard.com/fguncontrol47
> 78frm18
>>
>> 200 years ago people had muskets
> and it was hard to mass
>> murder people with those. But now
> people have machine guns
>> because the AWB was repealed so
> you have problems with mass
>> murder. Times have changed.
>