Follow us!

    Re: DV Misdemeanor Post-Conviction Reduction to an Infractio

    Posted by Hardy Parkerson, J.D. on 4/13/13

    Dear Edward,

    For free, feel free to contact me at
    hparkerson@suddenlink.net, and I'll discuss this matter with
    you. Also, you may want to call me on my cell to discuss it
    at 337-802-4041. Perhaps we should communicate first by e-
    mail, lest the cell-phone call come at a time when I am out
    in public, on the highway, etc.

    Whatever you do, best wishes!

    Sincerely,

    Hardy Parkerson, J.D.
    [Retired lawyer, after 41 years at the state and federal
    Bars; Tulane Law, Class of 1966]
    Lake Charles, LA, USA

    On 12/19/12, Edward wrote:
    > This question is from one of my Clients, any advice on how
    I
    > should proceed with him or guidance he should receive?
    >
    >
    >
    > I plead guilty to the following Misdemeanor Violation 243
    (e).
    >
    > However, I did not purposely use any force and my original
    > intention
    > was to plead innocent and see the case through.
    >
    > During the negotiations process, on the day of court trial,
    > my assigned Public Defender, was supposedly trying to
    explain
    > why I should just Plead to the 243(e)...
    >
    > In doing so, he illustrated by punching me in my
    arm, "lightly",
    > and saying, see that is all that you are pleading to...
    >
    > I feel that it was a form of coersion and that my
    physically
    > striking me,
    > he was diluting the seriousness of the charge, while
    > simultaneously
    > and intentionally, commiting the crime of battery upon me.
    >
    > It was very confusing to say the least, why he would think
    > that he could
    > do that to me, with no consecuences to himself, while I
    > would at the same time, be faced with it as a crime on my
    > record.
    >
    > After, having plead, and receiving the conviction. I later
    > reflected upon
    > what had happened on my trial day and mentioned it to the
    judge
    > to see if I could have my conviction overturned.
    >
    > The judge assigned a new public defender to me so that she
    > could
    > do a writ about the event and submit it to the judge.
    >
    > After speaking with my new attorney, I explained
    everything,
    > she also spoke with the previous public defender.
    > Unfortunately, she chose to dishonor the judges request
    > and chose not to file the writ on my behalf.
    > She, told me that it was something that I would need to do
    > myself.
    >
    > At this point, I have already completed all the
    requirements,
    > that were necessary to put the case behind me.
    > I did the classes and paid the fine.
    > I am going to ask for an early termination of my probation
    next,
    > which I believe will be granted, given that I have been law
    > abiding
    > and more than 50&37; of my probation time has already
    passed.
    >
    > And Finally, I was going to ask for an expungement,
    > which I believe would also be granted.
    >
    > My Question is:
    >
    > I recently learned that the California Expungement will not
    > restore my gun rights.
    >
    > Therefore, would it be possible for me to ask for a
    > reduction of the misdemeanor, to an infaction, instead of
    > applying for the expungement.
    >
    > Especially given, that the circumstances of the conviction,
    > were less than ideal.

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • DV Misdemeanor Post-Conviction Reduction to an Infraction, 12/19/12, by Edward.
  • Re: DV Misdemeanor Post-Conviction Reduction to an Infractio, 4/13/13, by Hardy Parkerson, J.D..
  • Re: DV Misdemeanor Post-Conviction Reduction to an Infractio, 11/20/14, by F.X. Martin.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.