Re: DV Misdemeanor Post-Conviction Reduction to an Infractio
Posted by Hardy Parkerson, J.D. on 4/13/13
Dear Edward, For free, feel free to contact me at hparkerson@suddenlink.net, and I'll discuss this matter with you. Also, you may want to call me on my cell to discuss it at 337-802-4041. Perhaps we should communicate first by e- mail, lest the cell-phone call come at a time when I am out in public, on the highway, etc. Whatever you do, best wishes! Sincerely, Hardy Parkerson, J.D. [Retired lawyer, after 41 years at the state and federal Bars; Tulane Law, Class of 1966] Lake Charles, LA, USA On 12/19/12, Edward wrote: > This question is from one of my Clients, any advice on how I > should proceed with him or guidance he should receive? > > > > I plead guilty to the following Misdemeanor Violation 243 (e). > > However, I did not purposely use any force and my original > intention > was to plead innocent and see the case through. > > During the negotiations process, on the day of court trial, > my assigned Public Defender, was supposedly trying to explain > why I should just Plead to the 243(e)... > > In doing so, he illustrated by punching me in my arm, "lightly", > and saying, see that is all that you are pleading to... > > I feel that it was a form of coersion and that my physically > striking me, > he was diluting the seriousness of the charge, while > simultaneously > and intentionally, commiting the crime of battery upon me. > > It was very confusing to say the least, why he would think > that he could > do that to me, with no consecuences to himself, while I > would at the same time, be faced with it as a crime on my > record. > > After, having plead, and receiving the conviction. I later > reflected upon > what had happened on my trial day and mentioned it to the judge > to see if I could have my conviction overturned. > > The judge assigned a new public defender to me so that she > could > do a writ about the event and submit it to the judge. > > After speaking with my new attorney, I explained everything, > she also spoke with the previous public defender. > Unfortunately, she chose to dishonor the judges request > and chose not to file the writ on my behalf. > She, told me that it was something that I would need to do > myself. > > At this point, I have already completed all the requirements, > that were necessary to put the case behind me. > I did the classes and paid the fine. > I am going to ask for an early termination of my probation next, > which I believe will be granted, given that I have been law > abiding > and more than 50&37; of my probation time has already passed. > > And Finally, I was going to ask for an expungement, > which I believe would also be granted. > > My Question is: > > I recently learned that the California Expungement will not > restore my gun rights. > > Therefore, would it be possible for me to ask for a > reduction of the misdemeanor, to an infaction, instead of > applying for the expungement. > > Especially given, that the circumstances of the conviction, > were less than ideal.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- DV Misdemeanor Post-Conviction Reduction to an Infraction, 12/19/12, by Edward.
- Re: DV Misdemeanor Post-Conviction Reduction to an Infractio, 4/13/13, by Hardy Parkerson, J.D..
- Re: DV Misdemeanor Post-Conviction Reduction to an Infractio, 11/20/14, by F.X. Martin.
|