Re: IF I.O.L.T.A. IS LEGAL . . .

More | Report Post

Here you go with that IOLTA thing again. You've worn it out.
Drop it! Get a life! The people who run the bar association are
going to do what they want, and to _ _ _ _ with you little guys!
Haven't you learned that by now! Those who have get, and those
who don't have get screwed (with metal screws). Face it,
Turkeys! The biggest crime in America is being poor.

On 11/29/03, Cajun. J.D. wrote:
>
>
> Don't care what they steal, just as long as I get my share.
>
> Cajun J.D.
>
>
>
> On 11/29/03, Georgia Peach wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> There's so much crooked stuff going on in Louisiana,
>> especially in the government, that I wonder why you Cajuns
>> live there. What is it about Cajuns? Are they just naturally
>> crooks and thieves?
>>
>> Georgia Peach
>> Atlanta
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/29/03, X-Office Holder wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> By the way, did you know that the money that defendants put
>>> up for bailbonds is deposited by the Sheriff in the bank and
>>> draws interest and the Sheriff gets the interest. Now
>>> that's a business ethics problem. Who rightfully should
>>> receive the interest earned off of defendants' money
>>> deposited with the Sheriffs of Louisiana for bailbonds?
>>> Looks to me like it should belong to the defendants who own
>>> the money deposited with the Sheriffs for bailbonds. More
>>> Louisiana crooked politics!
>>>
>>> On 11/29/03, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Counsel.Net Friends,
>>>>
>>>> Now that the Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 that
>>>> I.O.L.T.A. is legal (not moral, nor ethical), why not
>>>> take all the money that Sheriffs hold for bailbonds and
>>>> put it out to interest and give the interest to he bar
>>>> foundations? Why not take all the money held by untility
>>>> companies for utility deposits and put it out to interest
>>>> and give the interest earned off that money to the bar
>>>> foundations? Why not take all the money collected by
>>>> churches and put it out to interest and give the interest
>>>> to the bar foundations. No difference that I.O.L.T.A.
>>>> Pretty good idea! I.O.L.T.A. is not a matter of whether or
>>>> not it's legal. The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 that it
>>>> is. It's a matter of business ethics. Is it ethical?
>>>> It's a matter of theology. It is moral and honest? Must
>>>> be, if the Supreme Court says it is. But what about those
>>>> four Supreme Court Justices that say, "No, it's not
>>>> legal!"? There is more to it all than this, but this is
>>>> something to think about.
>>>>
>>>> HMP
>>>>

Re: IS THAT THE REAL HUNTER THOMPSON?, 12/06/03, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..

Business Law Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST