Re: Relevance?
Posted by roosta on 7/01/04
On 7/01/04, sharwinston wrote:
What, if any, is the relevance of your post to this board?
Madame Winston,upon reviewing the original post, I find NO
claim to relevance. Just as your post makes NO claim to
relevance. LOL I think OP was trying to encourage others to
dialogue with the President and circumvent his having to depend
on attorneys for business advice. Your objection is over----
whelmed. Good Dayyyy
Posts on this thread, including this one
- BUSH IS RUNNING SCARED; GETS OIL COMPANIES TO DROP GAS PRICE, 6/30/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: OIL COMPANIES TO DROP GAS PRICES, 7/01/04, by roosta.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by sharwinston.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by roosta.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by sharwinston.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***, 7/02/04, by Michael.
- Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***, 7/02/04, by August Boudreaux.
- Re: Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by roosta.
- Re: FUNNY! - Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by Mel Steinmetz.
- Re: FUNNY! - Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by v.
|
1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.