Re: Insurance....yes or no

More | Report Post

...because he is ALWAYS bring in money. However, to answer you
question, NO there are self-insurers who pay out money to plaintiff
attorneys. For some reason, you can not see beyond insurance.

On 9/25/05, Who Cares wrote:
>
>
> Dear Mr. Know-It-All
>
> Why are you sooo sassy mouth about attorneys? Did you read my post
> earlier? There are attorneys who get paid without insurance. Now -
> let's think - How do you think a defense attorney gets paid? by
> insurance? NO. By his or her good looks? NO. By luck? No. It is
> by the person who hires them for their defense. Getting a paycheck
> whenever the case is being worked on. The defense attorney isn't on
> a contingency fee. However, most NOT all plaintiff attorneys are on
> a contingency fee. Whereas, most business persons are making the
> defense attorneys VERY happy attorneys. So, whenever you are being
> sued your attorney is a very happy attorney. Why? Because he is WAY
> being in money. However, to answer your question, NO, there are self-
> insurers who pay out money to plaintiff attorneys. For some reason,
> you cannot see beyond insurance.
>
>
> On 9/24/05, matt wrote:
>> my arb clause limits damages to 1,000 dollars...we are allowed to
>> do that in Michigan.
>>
>> I also protect my assets about 9 other ways.
>>
>> Lawyers love insurance because it is a guaranteed pay check.
>>
>> A lawyer once won a suit against a home inspector but the
>> insuracne company would not pay the claim because the home
>> inspector never told the insurance company about the lawsuit,
>> didn't even show up in court. The winning lawyer tried to get his
>> own judgement set aside to inform the insurance company....so he
>> could retry the case. He didn't even go after the home inspector,
>> he was only interested in the insuracne company. That story was
>> told to me by a lawyer.
>>
>> Lawyers want a guaranteed paycheck, you know that as well as I do.
>>
>> are you even a lawyer? did you read the article I posted that
>> stated a judge set aside the arb clause and allowed the plaintiff
>> to sue anyway??????