Re: Insurance....yes or no

More | Report Post

Of course, I have execellent grammer skills, but not on this board.
Well, it sounds like you have it all figured out. Remember, your defense
attorney is a happy person. Keep making him or her happy, because the
defense attorneys are really the one who are LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE
BANK AT THE END OF THE DAY.

On 9/25/05, matt wrote:
> My arb clause limits damages to 1,000 dollars. That's legal in
> Michigan. I also have an LLC and none of my assets are in my name.
> I hope your legal knowledge is better than your grammar.
>
>
> On 9/25/05, Who Cares wrote:
>>
>> ...because he is ALWAYS bring in money. However, to answer you
>> question, NO there are self-insurers who pay out money to plaintiff
>> attorneys. For some reason, you can not see beyond insurance.
>>
>> On 9/25/05, Who Cares wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Know-It-All
>>>
>>> Why are you sooo sassy mouth about attorneys? Did you read my post
>>> earlier? There are attorneys who get paid without insurance. Now -
>>> let's think - How do you think a defense attorney gets paid? by
>>> insurance? NO. By his or her good looks? NO. By luck? No. It is
>>> by the person who hires them for their defense. Getting a paycheck
>>> whenever the case is being worked on. The defense attorney isn't on
>>> a contingency fee. However, most NOT all plaintiff attorneys are on
>>> a contingency fee. Whereas, most business persons are making the
>>> defense attorneys VERY happy attorneys. So, whenever you are being
>>> sued your attorney is a very happy attorney. Why? Because he is WAY
>>> being in money. However, to answer your question, NO, there are self-
>>> insurers who pay out money to plaintiff attorneys. For some reason,
>>> you cannot see beyond insurance.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/24/05, matt wrote:
>>>> my arb clause limits damages to 1,000 dollars...we are allowed to
>>>> do that in Michigan.
>>>>
>>>> I also protect my assets about 9 other ways.
>>>>
>>>> Lawyers love insurance because it is a guaranteed pay check.
>>>>
>>>> A lawyer once won a suit against a home inspector but the
>>>> insuracne company would not pay the claim because the home
>>>> inspector never told the insurance company about the lawsuit,
>>>> didn't even show up in court. The winning lawyer tried to get his
>>>> own judgement set aside to inform the insurance company....so he
>>>> could retry the case. He didn't even go after the home inspector,
>>>> he was only interested in the insuracne company. That story was
>>>> told to me by a lawyer.
>>>>
>>>> Lawyers want a guaranteed paycheck, you know that as well as I do.
>>>>
>>>> are you even a lawyer? did you read the article I posted that
>>>> stated a judge set aside the arb clause and allowed the plaintiff
>>>> to sue anyway??????