Post: Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ab77/7ab77609ea50f381c51b773802d8ee9c313a8f7c" alt=""
Posted by Michael Collins on 5/27/08
I was accused in 11/2002 by the Kirkland WA. Police
department of theft. The detective told me that if I left
the state of Washington the case would never go forward.
I was formally charged without my knowledge in Aug 2004
and of course there is a warrent for Theft I in King
County Washington Superior Court...
My accuser since then is facing a 7+ Felony count
indictment by the US govt and is awaiting trial. In the
indictment is clearly states that "As defendant xxxx xxxx
knew, all of the documents described in
paragraph 5 were false and fraudulent because he
instructed defendant yyyyyy to create
those documents using false information supplied by
defendant xxxx. As defendant xxxxx
further knew, defendant yyyy created each of the false
documents using a personal computer at
company xyz."
What is a reasonable fee for an atty to present all this
to the prosecutor's office and get this dropped?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk, 5/27/08, by Michael Collins.
- Re: Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk, 5/27/08, by Curmudgeon.