Re: IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD
Posted by JAP on 7/25/08

On 7/25/08, Curmudgeon wrote:
> You're not going to be able to find much help on this board or
> any sympathy from any court if you're not truthful. In your
> original post you said, "The trial attorney was "told not to
>>> defend" as per direct testimony." Now you're saying there
> was no testimony--direct or otherwise. So, which is it? Why
> don't you share that relevant part of the trial transcript? Or,
> are you saying that the attorney did not challenge any exhibits,
> cross-examine any witnesses, or make any arguments on your
> behalf?
>
> On 7/25/08, JAP wrote:
>> On 7/25/08, Curmudgeon wrote:
>>> And just who was it that gave direct testimony that he/she
>>> personally told your attorney not to defend you? And why
>>> was your attorney taking directions from anyone except you?
>>>
>>> On 7/25/08, JAP wrote:
>>>> Accoeding to police testimony I was initially pulled over
>>>> because of "driving a nice car in a bad neighborhood".
>>>> The evidence used was not turned in until three (3) days
>>>> after incarceration. The trial attorney was "told not to
>>>> defend" as per direct testimony. Soooo...what is the
>>>> problem here?
>>
>> The attorney did not say exactly who told him not to defend.
>> However there is recorded testimony of the admission. There
>> are also two witnesses. Is this someone who can help?
>> I have filed an application for writ of habeas corpus.

I am saying that he was "told not to defend" according to his (the
attorney) testimony. I am not aware of who told him not to defend.
When the testimony of the police officers came into the trial of
stopping me because of "driving a nice car in a bad
neighborhood". He did nothing to challenge with no probable
cause. Thus making this whole episode a gross miscarrage of
american justice, which can be proven through the trial
transcripts. The appointed attorney testified, after the trial was
over, with two agents present. of him being told not to
defend...recorded on cassette tapes. Could this be conspiracy or
even railroading???

Posts on this thread, including this one

• IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD" !!, 7/25/08, by JAP.
• Re: IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD, 7/25/08, by Curmudgeon.
• Re: IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD, 7/25/08, by JAP.
• Re: IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD, 7/25/08, by Curmudgeon.
• Re: IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD, 7/25/08, by JAP.
• Re: IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD, 7/26/08, by Curmudgeon.
• Re: IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD, 7/26/08, by JAP.