Follow us!

    Re: Shoplifting in Ohio

    Posted by M'sta Mikey on 11/02/05

    On 11/02/05, ohiofemale wrote:
    > I am 21 year old female in Ohio and I was stopped by loss-
    > prevention employees in a department store yesterday. I
    > had gone into a dressing room, removed the tags of a
    > sweater, put the sweater on and then put my coat on over
    > the sweater. I then left the dressing room and put the
    > tags of the sweater into a pair of pants. I walked out
    > the first set of doors to the store,9the doors before the
    > actual outside door) and the loss prevention woman
    > approached me. They told me they had video surveillance
    > of me placing the tags of a sweater I did not pay for in
    > another pair of jeans and walking out with the sweater.
    > However, all through the process I denied intentional
    > guilt and said it was unintentional and I didn't realize I
    > was walking off with the sweater. They came back holding
    > video tapes but I don't know of they were simply bluffing
    > with these tapes. They called the police and gave me a
    > blue ticket and I am scheduled to appear in court in two
    > days. I went to speak to some run-of-the-mill phone book
    > criminal attorney, and he told me his fee was a flat $500,
    > that he would most likely "win" the case, etc. Was he
    > telling me th truth or just trying to get my money? My
    > main question is...what do I do? Is it worth it to pay
    > for the attorney, since I intend to plead not guilty. In
    > Ohio am I qualified for this "diversion" I am reading
    > about? This is my first offense and after the officer
    > read me my Miranda Rights I told him I had no intent to
    > steal the sweater, there was no malice, it was a
    > misunderstanding, etc. Does the fact that I told the
    > police officer that I had no "intent" of stealing the
    > sweater matter. Isn't stealing based in "intent" anyway?
    > Basically, can the $500 attorney help me, is he worth it?
    > And ultimately, what can he in theory do to reduce the
    > charges.
    > Please help, I really need to know of it is worth the $500
    > attorney fee.
    > Any advice appreciated.

    Shoplifting is shoplifting - plain and simple! Intent or no
    intent, if you take something that you did not pay for, it's
    shoplifting.

    Spend the $500 - it's worth it. You may qualify for a
    diversion program but there is no gaurantee that the judge
    will grant you such. With an attorney, you stand a much
    better chance.

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/02/05, by ohiofemale.
  • Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/02/05, by M'sta Mikey.
  • Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/02/05, by ohiofemale.
  • Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/02/05, by M'sta Mikey.
  • Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/03/05, by Prairie Dawg.
  • Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 12/29/05, by amy.
  • Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 12/29/05, by amy.
  • Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 3/12/06, by anonymous.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.