Re: Shoplifting in Ohio
Posted by ohiofemale on 11/02/05
Is there any chance that with an attorney, after pleading not guilty, at any point the judge will dismiss charges? Thanks again On 11/02/05, M'sta Mikey wrote: > On 11/02/05, ohiofemale wrote: >> I am 21 year old female in Ohio and I was stopped by loss- >> prevention employees in a department store yesterday. I >> had gone into a dressing room, removed the tags of a >> sweater, put the sweater on and then put my coat on over >> the sweater. I then left the dressing room and put the >> tags of the sweater into a pair of pants. I walked out >> the first set of doors to the store,9the doors before the >> actual outside door) and the loss prevention woman >> approached me. They told me they had video surveillance >> of me placing the tags of a sweater I did not pay for in >> another pair of jeans and walking out with the sweater. >> However, all through the process I denied intentional >> guilt and said it was unintentional and I didn't realize I >> was walking off with the sweater. They came back holding >> video tapes but I don't know of they were simply bluffing >> with these tapes. They called the police and gave me a >> blue ticket and I am scheduled to appear in court in two >> days. I went to speak to some run-of-the-mill phone book >> criminal attorney, and he told me his fee was a flat $500, >> that he would most likely "win" the case, etc. Was he >> telling me th truth or just trying to get my money? My >> main question is...what do I do? Is it worth it to pay >> for the attorney, since I intend to plead not guilty. In >> Ohio am I qualified for this "diversion" I am reading >> about? This is my first offense and after the officer >> read me my Miranda Rights I told him I had no intent to >> steal the sweater, there was no malice, it was a >> misunderstanding, etc. Does the fact that I told the >> police officer that I had no "intent" of stealing the >> sweater matter. Isn't stealing based in "intent" anyway? >> Basically, can the $500 attorney help me, is he worth it? >> And ultimately, what can he in theory do to reduce the >> charges. >> Please help, I really need to know of it is worth the $500 >> attorney fee. >> Any advice appreciated. > > Shoplifting is shoplifting - plain and simple! Intent or no > intent, if you take something that you did not pay for, it's > shoplifting. > > Spend the $500 - it's worth it. You may qualify for a > diversion program but there is no gaurantee that the judge > will grant you such. With an attorney, you stand a much > better chance. >
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/02/05, by ohiofemale.
- Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/02/05, by M'sta Mikey.
- Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/02/05, by ohiofemale.
- Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/02/05, by M'sta Mikey.
- Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 11/03/05, by Prairie Dawg.
- Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 12/29/05, by amy.
- Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 12/29/05, by amy.
- Re: Shoplifting in Ohio, 3/12/06, by anonymous.
|