Follow us!

    Re: British Airways refused boarding

    Posted by Curmudgeon on 4/18/06

    No.

    On 4/18/06, PK wrote:
    > BA has all the right to refuse boarding as long it is
    > universally applicable. BA made great efforts to tell you on
    > their website what all legal documents and procedures are
    > necessary except this one. You can say that they are not
    > required to do so and they can say it is my responsibility to
    > check these regulations by visiting UK's consulate website.
    >
    > BA can wash their hands of all responsibilities. They can say
    > that they have a special product, that does not require a
    > warning label, but if I consume that product I am liable for
    > violating that law. I am just wondering if it is applicable to
    > all or some products.
    >
    > What I am trying to say is that they did violate the law. And
    by
    > doing so jeopardized my wife's safety. They have a inconsistent
    > system in place where sometimes they will let you through and
    > sometimes not. If it had happened the first time when she went
    > by BA last June I would not be complaining as much. Except that
    > I would say it is very bad customer service.
    >
    > As far as cash registers ringing, I see that on their side.
    > Happily collected the money without any regards to whether we
    > are able to fly or not.
    >
    > All I want to know, given that I am not an expert, whether this
    > case has any merit.
    >
    > On 4/18/06, Curmudgeon wrote:
    >> You want to sue BA for failing to warn you to not break the
    >> law?????? I can already hear those cash registers ringing.
    >>
    >> On 4/18/06, PK wrote:
    >>> OK here is the story:
    >>> My wife had to go to India in a hurry because her father
    >> was
    >>> ill. She bought a British Airways ticket but was stopped in
    >>> Philadelphia apparently because she needed a air-side
    >>> transit visa for passing through London. She is a permanent
    >>> resident and I found out later that 2 years back they
    >>> instituted a new rule saying that this visa is required is
    >>> the US permanent residence was issued before April 21st
    >>> 1998. Guess what hers was issued Nov 1997. She eventually
    >>> made it to India by KLM.
    >>>
    >>> Bad luck you would say. But here is the rest of the story:
    >>> She was issued a boarding pass in Pittsburg for her flight
    >>> out of Philadelphia to London to Delhi. They checked her
    >>> documents in Pittsburgh and the only reason they found it
    >>> out in Philly was because she went to the counter to change
    >>> her seat. Bad luck again. Otherwise, no one would have
    >> found
    >>> it out. We did not know.
    >>>
    >>> And here is the last part. She went to India June 2005 by
    >>> British Airways and no one stopped her for not having a
    >>> air-side transit visa both ways. And this rule was supposed
    >>> to have gone into effect 2yrs back.
    >>>
    >>> Can we sue BA?
    >>> - for not mentioning this requirement on their webiste
    >>> when they have several other warnings and not this one.
    >>> Plus, they require you to input all passport and green card
    >>> info. So they could have easily warned us long before.
    >>> - for failing to stop her from going the first time. And
    >>> thus violating UKs immigration rules and jeopardizing my
    >>> wife's safety. Because if she were caught the first time
    >>> then it would have been a nightmare.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks for reading so far.

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • British Airways refused boarding, 4/18/06, by PK.
  • Re: British Airways refused boarding, 4/18/06, by Curmudgeon.
  • Re: British Airways refused boarding, 4/18/06, by PK.
  • Re: British Airways refused boarding, 4/18/06, by Curmudgeon.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.