Follow us!

    Re: Is this double jeopardy?

    Posted by Jason on 10/08/10

    On 9/19/10, Jake remmington wrote:
    > During a traffic stop a spoon is
    > found containing meth residue.
    > Subject admits to arresting
    > officers the he ingested the
    > remainder of the drugs and is
    > taken to hospital where a piece
    > of coffee filter is recovered
    > which tests positive for meth
    > residue. He is later indicted on
    > two seperate counts of
    > possession and pleads guilty to
    > both. One relating to the spoon ;
    > one relating to the coffe filter
    > recovered from his stomach. is
    > this a violation of double
    > jeopardy ?


    No! Here is the definition of Double Jeopardy... [T]he
    Double Jeopardy Clause protects against three distinct
    abuses: [1] a second prosecution for the same offense AFTER
    acquittal; [2] a second prosecution for the same offense
    AFTER conviction; and [3] multiple punishments for the same
    offense.' U.S. v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 440 (1989).

    As it reads, there are two separate counts that are tried
    under one criminal prosecution. You do not indicate that
    there was a successive prosecution for the same offense.

    the logical answer according to the way it was written is no-
    -but then again i'm not an attorney!

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Is this double jeopardy?, 9/19/10, by Jake remmington.
  • Re: Is this double jeopardy?, 10/08/10, by Jason.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.