Re: LL.M degree will not get you bar admission

More | Report Post

Don't you turkeys have better things to do than to babble nonsense on this board?
It's embarrasing.

Idiot Police

On 10/01/08, Crown Prince wrote:
> Are you an idiot? Seriously, are you an idiot? Thats one of the reasons I don't have any more clients.
>
> Read my post again. Take an English course and learn how to spell. You should also learn proper sentence structure and
> syntax. If you are truly an ABA grad, I will eat my shorts.
>
> By the way, I wasn't stretched too thin to win a majority of my cases. I never cost any of my clients a dime.
>
> Crown Prince
>
>
>
> On 10/01/08, WSCL lol wrote:
>> Clown Prince........and you wannabe
>> be an attorney at law when you grow up, lol.
>>
>> Do this old, infirmed, disabled people you
>> represent as a "represenstative" know you
>> might be stretched too thin and they might
>> be better off with an ABA attorney at law
>> who's only freakin job is their day job?
>>
>> On 10/01/08, Crown Prince wrote:
>>> You are full of it.
>>>
>>> First, read my post. I NEVER said that I made a six figure income doing it. Pay attention to detail (you know, words!?!)
>>> For someone who represents others in court, you sure don't pay attention to written detail...
>>>
>>> I have only had about a dozen cases, and won most of them. Part time. Off of one classified ad in the LA times (paid
>>> about $500 for one month for all of the areas). Made nearly $25K for a total of less than a hundred hours of work
>>> (total). Thats the truth. Believe it. Honestly, when I pass the bar, I will probably do SS law if I don't move back to
>>> California. However, any monkey who can read the regs and send people to the right doctors can do it. If you are doing it
>>> full time, and can't get fifty winning cases a year at an average of $2000 a piece, then YOU really don't know anything
>>> about it. The only reason I couldn't do it anymore is because I took a job with the federal government, and representing
>>> clients would be a conflict of interest (and against the law).
>>>
>>> If wasn't simultaneously working full time as a nurse, in my third year at WCSL (studying for the bar), finishing my
>>> second masters degree in education/teaching credential at Western Governor's University (8 units/term), producing a set
>>> of DVD's for the CLEP/AP History/Government Exams (I got an okay from the College Board to do this) and writing a book
>>> (while finding time somehow in between to see my wife and kids), then I could make six figures a year doing monkey
>>> business. I will make a lot more when I pass the bar. Eat my dust. (I am 27, by the way, how old are you???)
>>>
>>> I am growing tired of people being naysayers and putting other people down on this board. Can we please start getting to
>>> a proactive discussion of distance learning law schools and stop this petty crap?
>>>
>>> CP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/30/08, .... wrote:
>>>> Crown Prince I have been practicing in the area of social security disability for nearly 9 years and I have to say you
>>>> do not sound like you know anything about the level of practice that provides a 6-figure income. (I have often
>>>> enjoyed such a level of income so I speak from experience).
>>>>
>>>> 'Here we go again' appears to never have stepped foot into an administrative proceeding because representing clients
>>>> in SSA matters does in fact involve the practice of law.
>>>>
>>>> Formulating a legal opinion and giving it in writing and orally in front of an ALJ is certainly practicing law with
>>>> very real legal consequences to the client.
>>>>
>>>> Conducting cross on a government vocational or medical expert requires proper voir dire and a knowledge of evidence in
>>>> order to preserve the record for federal court review even if the representative is not an attorney.
>>>>
>>>> SSA is much more than simply putting medical records in front of the ALJ and winning an award.
>>>>
>>>> There are medical elements to be met that must be established using evidence.
>>>>
>>>> There are vocational elements that also require evidence.
>>>>
>>>> These elements intertwine with legal elements and issues that gel into a complicated body of statutory law,
>>>> administrative rulings, and federal case law.
>>>>
>>>> SSA is not for amateurs and even though lay practtioners are allowed to represent claimants - and there are some
>>>> competent ones - most lay reps are mostly incompetent and very lucky that the judge does the work for them at the
>>>> hearing. They get disbarred from SSA all the time.
>>>>
>>>> Unless you have practiced SSA for a period of 4 or 5 years you don't know what you are talking about.
>>>>
>>>> Sure you can spew your BS here anonymously but some of us here do know what we are doing and know that you are full of
>>>> the poop :)
>>>>
>>>> Back to practicing law now....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/30/08, look it up if dont know what it means wrote:
>>>>> Here we go again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another wannabe lawyer acting as a representative
>>>>> in stupid social security hearings and thinking they are practicing law
>>>>> and thinking their DL degree is gonna help them in
>>>>> the social security hearing is ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>> The practice of law is giving legal opinions orally
>>>>> and in writing and litigating in a COURT of law.
>>>>>
>>>>> Passing the bar is the sine qua non for "practicing
>>>>> law".
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone, my gardner, my barber, my realtor, can represent
>>>>> someone in an adminstrative hearing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/30/08, Crown Prince wrote:
>>>>>> Actually, there are many of us who make upwards of 100K doing social security disability.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are making only 15K, it means you are only winning between three and seven cases per year. If you are doing
>>>>>> it full time, that is pretty pathetic, unless that is what you want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still, better to take the bar. Do it right, unless it floats your boat to do something else. To each their own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CP
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/29/08, -- wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/29/08, Think about it wrote:
>>>>>>>> Guys & Gals,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LD's banter appeals to the "want-a-be" quasi-lawyer types, they think they can get a 5th rate DL law school
>>>>>>>> education from a school like Novus and then practice SSA administrative law carving out a meager living of
>>>>>>>> $150k per year.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In their dreams. 15K is more realistic.