Re: No one posts on this chat anymore!?!?!

More | Report Post

Does anybody post on the DL chat anymore?

Crown Prince

On 3/02/07, Crown Prince wrote:
> You know, it is a fact that Wisconsin will allow graduates of California
> Correspondence Law Schools to sit for their bar exam. It is, however,
> Wisconsin :( Do an internet search, as there are a few articles on the
> subject.
>
> Crow Prince
>
>
>
>
> On 2/22/07, Perspective student wrote:
>> On the other hand, some states such as Texas recently proposed
>> legislation which would allow distance-educated persons to take the
>> Texas bar exam. The argument was also that this would help many persons
>> who cannot afford an education in law.
>>
>>
>> I believe that this is signs of the future. At some time, probably all
>> universities will offer 'distance-education'. There is no reason why
>> they shouldn't with the available technology of this age.
>>
>> On 8/01/06, ABA graduate wrote:
>>> 1) California legislation is working on
>>> passing a law, Senate Bill 1568 to take
>>> control away from the BPPVE (a useless
>>> state agency) and give control for ALL
>>> unaccredited law schools to the State Bar.
>>>
>>> Even is such law is not passed,the State Bar
>>> by virtue of its adminstrative function for
>>> the California Supreme Court has been given
>>> authority by statute to regulation bar admission
>>> and law schools so they can change the rules
>>> without new legislation.
>>>
>>> 2)The State Bar wants to toughen up the
>>> rules for operating unaccredited law schools
>>> and correspondence law schools, and as a result
>>> many correspondence law schools wont be able to
>>> comply with the new operational rules and will have
>>> to close.
>>>
>>> 3) The State Bar is not happy with the BPPVE's
>>> granting of approval to unaccredited and law schools
>>> to award the useless non-bar J.D. degree which doesnt
>>> require passage of the Baby Bar before continuing onto
>>> to the remaining law study and the J.D. degree.
>>>
>>> The State Bar wants too and will ELIMINATE the non-bar
>>> J.D. degree as it is useless, doesnt serve the purpose
>>> of a professional degree and devalues the J.D. degree
>>> of those that earned a Bar Qualifying J.D. degree.
>>>
>>> I SUPPORT THE CLOSING OF 75&37; OF CORRESPONDENCE LAW
>>> SCHOOLS AND I SUPPORT THE ELIMINATION OF THE NON-BAR
>>> J.D. DEGREE!
>>>
>>> On 8/01/06, JD wannabe wrote:
>>>> Why do you say they are subject to change "very soon"? Where do you
>>>> get this information from? Thanks for your help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/07/06, Yes I am a Real Lawyer wrote:
>>>>> I am aware of that, I am aware of every single aspect
>>>>> of the California Bar Admissions rule which by the
>>>>> way are subject to change very soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> I dont know what the heck that has to do with
>>>>> my dislike with non-bar J.D. degrees or 1 man
>>>>> operation law schools,both of which the State
>>>>> Bar is working on eliminating!