Post: Procecuted again for evidence they already had
Posted by Tim on 6/03/03
Hi, I was recently arrested and charged by state for manufacturing marijuana with intent to destribute and possesion of a firearm with a pound of marijuana. State then dropped the charges and federal picked them up and charged me with possesion with intent to destribute and possesion of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking. I was found not guilty of both counts and then found guilty of the lesser offence of possesion. When the detectives first arrested me I admitted that I smoked marijuana and that I had smoked some right before they got there. This was even written on my signed statement. They also arrested me with drug paraphanlia (sp?) and of course marijuana. During the federal investigation the detectives interviewed 2 friends that both admitted that I smoked marijuana and had seen me. This was all before I was found not guilty of the offenses. Now I just received a letter stating they plan on prossecuting me not for possesion of a firearm by an unlawful user of a controled substance. They said that this charge comes from statements at my recent court apperance. At court, myself and other friends admitted I smoked marijuana. My question is, shouldn't this charge have been included as a lessor offense in the first case? And also, with the statements and evidence listed above which would have been enough to prosecute me in the first place, can they turn around a prosecute me now for this? Thank you for your time. Please let me know. Tim
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Procecuted again for evidence they already had, 6/03/03, by Tim.
- Re: Procecuted again for evidence they already had, 6/05/03, by sarah.
- Re: Procecuted again for evidence they already had, 6/09/03, by Tim.
|