Re: Miranda rights
Posted by Miranda on 11/02/03
Police have no obligation to read Miranda rights after arresting a subject. None. If they don't, they can't use the subject's statements against him in court. Thus under current case law, Miranda is merely an evidentiary rule. One common technique police use, which is legal under current case law, is to question a subject in custody without Mirandizing him, then Mirandize him and ask him the same questions again. The first round of statements are not admissable in court. The second set of statements are. Because a subject who has not been Mirandized and has confessed already feels he has confessed, he is often willing to confess again after being Mirandized.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- meranda rights, 11/01/03, by john doe.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/01/03, by sharwinston.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/02/03, by Miranda.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/06/03, by Micheal Shea.
- Re: Miranda rights, 3/05/04, by CLB.
- Re: Miranda rights, 3/10/04, by CBL.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Ozarks Lawyer.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/24/04, by SFanua.
|