Re: Miranda rights

More | Report Post

On 3/05/04, CLB wrote:
> On 11/02/03, Miranda wrote:
>> Police have no obligation to read Miranda rights after
>> arresting a subject. None.
>>
>> If they don't, they can't use the subject's statements against
>> him in court. Thus under current case law, Miranda is merely
>> an evidentiary rule.
>>
>> One common technique police use, which is legal under current
>> case law, is to question a subject in custody without
>> Mirandizing him, then Mirandize him and ask him the same
>> questions again.
>>
>> The first round of statements are not admissable in court.
>> The second set of statements are.
>>
>> Because a subject who has not been Mirandized and has
>> confessed already feels he has confessed, he is often willing
>> to confess again after being Mirandized.
>
> Where in the Constitution has it changed for a cop to not have to
> read you your Miranda Rights upon arrest? I have yet to see were
> this has changed. Probably because just to many have got away
> with it for so long it just changed everywhere. I don't know
> where our RIGHTS as AMERICANS have gone and who made these cops
> God but "WE THE PEOPLE" need to start fighting for what they are
> taking from us and that is everything pretty rapidly and the sad
> thing is those who sit there and tell themselves ah we people are
> crazy this aint happening. Well guess what it is happening and
> the Constitution and our RIGHTS were based upon "WE THE PEOPLE
> (which is us)". We need to start jumping up and down loudly NOW
> or it is going to be to late. Those of you that sit there and
> say it won't effect me eventually it will effect you because the
> time you open your eyes to it all it will be way to late.