Re: Miranda rights

More | Report Post

On 11/02/03, Miranda wrote:
> Police have no obligation to read Miranda rights after
> arresting a subject. None.
>
> If they don't, they can't use the subject's statements against
> him in court. Thus under current case law, Miranda is merely
> an evidentiary rule.
>
> One common technique police use, which is legal under current
> case law, is to question a subject in custody without
> Mirandizing him, then Mirandize him and ask him the same
> questions again.
>
> The first round of statements are not admissable in court.
> The second set of statements are.
>
> Because a subject who has not been Mirandized and has
> confessed already feels he has confessed, he is often willing
> to confess again after being Mirandized.

Where in the Constitution has it changed for a cop to not have to
read you your Miranda Rights upon arrest? I have yet to see were
this has changed. Probably because just to many have got away
with it for so long it just changed everywhere. I don't know
where our RIGHTS as AMERICANS have gone and who made these cops
God but "WE THE PEOPLE" need to start fighting for what they are
taking from us and that is everything pretty rapidly and the sad
thing is those who sit there and tell themselves ah we people are
crazy this aint happening. Well guess what it is happening and
the Constitution and our RIGHTS were based upon "WE THE PEOPLE
(which is us)". We need to start jumping up and down loudly NOW
or it is going to be to late. Those of you that sit there and
say it won't effect me eventually it will effect you because the
time you open your eyes to it all it will be way to late.

Re: Miranda rights, 11/24/04, by SFanua.

Due Process Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST