Posted by Joseph Robinson on 1/18/04

More | Report Post

FACTS
1) Plumas County, California Sheriff, Prosecutor and Judge
committed numerous Constitutional violations including
unreasonable search and violation of my right to counsel
and violation of my right to present a defense to the
jury to unlawfully convict and imprison me in a medica
marijuana case.(CASE NUMBER: 00-26978)
2) After over 19 months in prison and a month on parole
release the California Appellate Court, Third District,
reversed my conviction finding that the Plumas County
court officers vioilated my Constitutional right to the
assistance of counsel, California Penal Code Section
866.5 and "all the rules of fair play".
CASE NUMBER: C039311
3) California Attorney General did not appeal the ruling.
4) The Appellate Court remitted my case back to the
Plumas County court.
5) The Plumas County court dismissed all charges "in the
interest of justice" on September 3, 2003.

THE RECORD IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR ON SEVERAL SALIENT POINTS:
1) the Plumas County Clowns violated my right to counsel;
2) the Plumas County Clowns unlawfully convicted me;
3) the Plumas County Clowns unlawfully imprisoned me;
4) the Plumas County Clowns violated my right to counsel,
unlawfully convicted me and unlawfully imprisoned me
knowingly or unknowingly.(malice or incompetence)
5) California has the defacto practice and policy and
practice of condoning malicous, incompetent judges
and prosecutors.

I served a claim on California, Plumas County, the
California Judicial Council, the California Commission on
Judicial Performance on January 15, 2004.

I NEED HELP TO PURSUE MY SUIT FOR DAMAGES WHEN MY CLAIMS
HAVE BEEN REJECTED.

josephrob@earthlink.net

Re: COMPENSATION UNLAWFUL CONVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT, 3/09/05, by v.

Due Process Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST