Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?
Posted by Don Wall on 7/19/05
On 8/12/04, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote: > > > > Dear Hopeful2, > > Please, as much as you can, on line, provide more > informaiton. We would like to be of help, but need more > info. Remember this: For every injustice the law lends a > remedy; it is just up to a good lawyer to find that remedy > and to pursue it until justice is done. Good luck! You'll > make it. Hit back! You've been hit. HIt back! Christ said > if someone slaps you on the check to turn the other cheek. > Here nobody slapped you on the cheek. Sue the batard! > > Sincerely, > > Hardy Parkerson, Atty. > Lake Charles and New Orleans > > > > On 8/12/04, Hopeful2 wrote: >> I was accused of "criminal" behavior by my employer, >> however he chose not to report it. There was no >> investigation, and I was basically accused, convicted, and >> sentenced by him. I believe I am innocent, and my > sentence >> is to never be able to work in my profession again. In my >> profession, one is only as good as their last employment >> reference, and I am being denied one. I am now > unemployed, >> and unable to support myself, keep my home, pay my bills, >> etc. During this process I was threatened, intimidated, >> and asked to participate in the "cover-up" of this >> incident. I am not sure why this employer went off the >> deep end with his interpretation of my actions; however, I >> am being denied the security camera video tape that >> supposedly supports his claim; I believe it supports my >> innocence. I was told it will never be shown to anyone; I >> replied that I want it shown, especially to a qualified >> professional who can make a judgement. How can he get > away >> with this? How can he destoy my life? Am I entitled >> to "due process"? Everyone in this country is entitled to "due process." From I can see from the above narrative, there was never even a court case. Even the Constitution mandates a 5 year limitation whereas any agency has to bring an inditctment against the alleged, such as yourself. If it were me, I would be down at the district courthouse filing a 42 USC 1983 law suit against this individual. No person, not even the state can withstand the supreme law of the land and that is the Federal Constitution. In other words: Sue the bastard!
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Who is entitled to Due Process?, 8/12/04, by Hopeful2.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 8/12/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 8/12/04, by v.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 8/12/04, by Hopeful2.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 8/12/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 8/12/04, by Hopeful2.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 8/13/04, by v.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process? Union/Labor Help, 8/13/04, by Hopeful2.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process? Union/Labor Help, 8/14/04, by v.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process? Where's Hardy?, 8/15/04, by Hopeful2.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 7/19/05, by Don Wall.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 7/19/05, by JOJO.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 7/31/05, by leon.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?, 7/31/05, by leon.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?**V'ster**, 7/31/05, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?**Mudge**, 7/31/05, by v.
- Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?**Mudge**, 8/01/05, by leon.
|