Re: Who is entitled to Due Process?**V'ster**

More | Report Post

V'ster--better go check the still. I think someone's pilfering
the mash.

On 7/31/05, leon wrote:
> On 7/19/05, Don Wall wrote:
>> On 8/12/04, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Hopeful2,
>>>
>>> Please, as much as you can, on line, provide more
>>> informaiton. We would like to be of help, but need more
>>> info. Remember this: For every injustice the law lends a
>>> remedy; it is just up to a good lawyer to find that remedy
>>> and to pursue it until justice is done. Good luck! You'll
>>> make it. Hit back! You've been hit. HIt back! Christ said
>>> if someone slaps you on the check to turn the other cheek.
>>> Here nobody slapped you on the cheek. Sue the batard!
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Hardy Parkerson, Atty.
>>> Lake Charles and New Orleans
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/12/04, Hopeful2 wrote:
>>>> I was accused of "criminal" behavior by my employer,
>>>> however he chose not to report it. There was no
>>>> investigation, and I was basically accused, convicted, and
>>>> sentenced by him. I believe I am innocent, and my
>>> sentence
>>>> is to never be able to work in my profession again. In my
>>>> profession, one is only as good as their last employment
>>>> reference, and I am being denied one. I am now
>>> unemployed,
>>>> and unable to support myself, keep my home, pay my bills,
>>>> etc. During this process I was threatened, intimidated,
>>>> and asked to participate in the "cover-up" of this
>>>> incident. I am not sure why this employer went off the
>>>> deep end with his interpretation of my actions; however, I
>>>> am being denied the security camera video tape that
>>>> supposedly supports his claim; I believe it supports my
>>>> innocence. I was told it will never be shown to anyone; I
>>>> replied that I want it shown, especially to a qualified
>>>> professional who can make a judgement. How can he get
>>> away
>>>> with this? How can he destoy my life? Am I entitled
>>>> to "due process"?
>>
>>
>> Everyone in this country is entitled to "due process."
>> From I can see from the above narrative, there was never even
> a
>> court case. Even the Constitution mandates a 5 year
> limitation
>> whereas any agency has to bring an inditctment against the
>> alleged, such as yourself. If it were me, I would be down at
>> the district courthouse filing a 42 USC 1983 law suit against
>> this individual. No person, not even the state can withstand
>> the supreme law of the land and that is the Federal
>> Constitution. In other words: Sue the bastard!
>> in an adninistrative court under administrarive law, you will
> hardly win, the only way to sure win is to put it under an
> equtorial court of law, you can either put it under
> disrimination or violation of due process, but the first thing
> is to hang him on hearsay,, and thats where administrative
> courts screw you,,, since they go by hearsay, so you have to
> establish a no hearsay rule,, and stick them (the administrative
> court judge) to it, hearsay is the twisted devil that screws so
> many people,,equtorial law of the United States is the law of
> the land ,,, civil rules are admin rules.