Re: CURMUDGEN V RESPOND
Posted by v on 3/14/05
TV: Your son got busted for not folowing the rules. I'm not an attorney, but in this situation there is no due process. He knew the rules, he broke them three times. He is paying the price. He is your responsabilty. There are laws against truency. If your son can't learn how to behave now. Who's fault is it? you blame the courts? The court is going to blame you! & he'll learn the hard way now before he has to in prison latter. Sociaty dosen't have to tolerate bad behavior. AND THE MESSAGE HAS BEEN SENT. Apparently niether of you get it. Sounds like you are condonning this. Maybe you are part of the problem. On 3/14/05, tv wrote: > On 3/14/05, Curmudgeon wrote: >> Sir v, you're closer than you thought. >> >> The posts piqued my interest, so I did a little digging. In >> the OP's home county, there is a cooperative program >> established by the schools, juvenile authorities, and the >> courts. >> >> It kicks in when a child has received a third out-of-school >> suspension and is, thus, facing expulsion. Rather than >> letting the little buggers run the streets unsupervised while >> suspended, they are required to report to the program and >> spend the days studying, doing community service, and taking >> appropriate classes on anger management, life skills, etc. >> >> If they fail to report on the first day of the suspension, >> they will be picked up and held until they can go before the >> judge and explain why they didn't report. It is the parents' >> responsibility to get the child to the program. >> >> Amazingly, many of the involved parents complain because its >> such a "hardship" to deliver the child to the program and pick >> him up at the end of the day. >> >> On 3/14/05, v wrote: >>> TV: Are you related to Roosta? I >>> wouldn't worrie about the little >>> buggers. It'll keep them off the >>> streets. Their probly headed for >>> prison any way. >>> >>> On 3/14/05, TV wrote: >>>> hello reader. in the city of >>> wabash in wabash county ind >>>> ther is an order from local >>> court that apon 3rd referral >>>> to out of school suspension from >>> principal. that the child >>>> is to be picked up immmediatly >>> and put in detention center >>>> until next court date. some of >>> the offenses that can get a >>>> refferall are tardys horseplay >>> foul language ect. mostly >>>> descretion of principal. seems >>> to me this gives principal >>>> the power to sentence children >>> to jail time without their >>>> due process. they also make them >>> write out a statement of >>>> guilt to be used against them in >>> court but they are >>>> teenagers and dont understand >>> what their doing as far as >>>> legality, they are told to just >>> write the statement and >>>> they may or may not get >>> suspended. they are not told that >>>> it will be used against them in >>> court. it seems to me that >>>> the principal given this power >>> should be considered as an >>>> officer of the court and have to >>> go by their rules as far >>>> as interegating a student for >>> info to be solely used >>>> against them in court. and my >>> question is can a local >>>> judge issue such a blank order >>> legally wouldnt it have to >>>> be some type of city or county >>> ordinance. thnx tv >>> > ok gonna try this 1 more time the juvenile was taken to det > center on friday he was to report to day reporting on monday > thats today. we went to court today he spent the weekend in det > center. this morning in court he was ordered to report to day > reporting. i told the judge we wanted a lawyer, he said we could > hire a lawyer and contest it but as far as he was concernd my > son was to report to day reporting. we werent given any > oppertunity to put up a defense of any kind. and my son spent 3 > days in det without being charged for any crime. so as you can > see he wasnt sent to det center for not showing up. he was sent > because of the 3rd referral. get it now and he was also > sentenced to day reporting. so you tell me where was the due > process we had 1 court appearance and it was a > sentecing. thnx tv
Posts on this thread, including this one
- PRINCIPLE SENDING KIDS TO JAIL, 3/14/05, by TV.
- Re: PRINCIPLE SENDING KIDS TO JAIL, 3/14/05, by v.
- Re: PRINCIPLE SENDING KIDS TO JAIL, 3/14/05, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: PRINCIPLE SENDING KIDS TO JAIL"V", 3/14/05, by roosta.
- Re: PRINCIPLE SENDING KIDS TO JAIL, 3/14/05, by v.
- Re: CURMUDGEN V RESPOND , 3/14/05, by tv.
- Re: life skills - Mudge , 3/14/05, by Ozarks Lawyer.
- Re: CURMUDGEN V RESPOND , 3/14/05, by v.
- Re: life skills - TV , 3/14/05, by roosta.
- Re: CURMUDGEN V RESPOND , 3/17/05, by tv.
- Re: life skills - TV , 3/17/05, by tv.
- Re: CURMUDGEN V RESPOND , 3/17/05, by v.
- Re: CURMUDGEN V RESPOND , 3/17/05, by tv.
- Re: CURMUDGEN V RESPOND , 3/17/05, by tv.
- Re: CURMUDGEN V RESPOND , 3/17/05, by v.
|