Re: Admissibility of Coerced confession

More | Report Post

I don't think attacking this persons spelling, and education is
appropriate, I have a mentally disabled friend who spells really
bad at times, who was falsely arrested, and told by the guy doing
his prints that he would shove his fingers up his ass if he smuded
one. curmudgeons will be curmudgeons. Hey I think the fingerprint
guys name was Corporal Curmudgeon. Wonder if he got a "talking
too" after my friend reported him to Internal Affairs.

On 8/13/06, Curmudgeon wrote:
> You also had a constitutional right to a free public education-
> -including grammar and spelling. You obviously didn't
> exercise that right, either.
>
> On 8/13/06, Teri wrote:
>> On 12/28/05, Jeff wrote:
>>> To Jeff Does anyone have any thoughts on admissibility
>> of a
>>> confessed coerced during interrogation by Federal agenys?
>> Yes, part of the just-us system. You may look up cases where
>> a few honest Judges has up held maranda rights when
>> confessions has been coerced or forced. By decieving
>> practices and lies, or physical force --in which the
>> defendant is usually handcuffed and or 10 to one situation
>> where the victum-defendant is not in a position to fight
>> back. Cowardly as it is, it goes on all the time look at the
>> never ending law suits comming out of California in
>> Sacramento alone. Where also fALSE CONFESSIONS ARE OVER
>> LOOKED, EVEN ALLEGATIONS PERGURY BY POLICE OFFICERS EGNORED.
>> Not to mention cop happy judges who seem to promote this
> sort
>> of behavior. Even if in this seemingly backward town if a
> new
>> trial is permitted the prosecutor may-as they say- taint it
>> with mentioning the confession even after it was thrown out
>> for the purpose of having the jurors hear it and assume that
>> because IT WAS SAID IT MUST BE TRUE, not realizing the
>> circumstances of how it was obtained and getting a
>> conviction.It taught me that if I were a juror if I even
>> heard it was done in a deciving was or cohersed I would find
>> them not guilty and if people want to guard there rights
> they
>> perhaps sshold do the same until they get the message.Unless
>> we have enough honest lawers to fight for our constitutional
>> rights and jurors educated to this decieving practice, the
>> people we will be equal to a third world corrupt monarcy.
>> This could happen to anyone at any time. Michigan v. Tucker
>> (1974) Court reversed conviction. Don't seem too soon
> comming
>> to California especially if lawyers are fearfull of cop
> happy
>> Judges I have heard of and have seen myself. Judges who
>> recommend convictions based on false confessions even BEFORE
>> THE TRIAL> JURY TRIAL. JUST-US SYSTEM