Re: MBNA, Wolpoff & Abramson, National Arbitration Forum

More | Report Post

I entered into a credit management program in August of 2006 due
to child-custody proceedings that brought about extensive legal
fees and debt. In January of 2007 I was contacted by my credit
management company, who told me that Wolpoff & Abramson has made a
settlement offer. We began negotiating the offer for me to pay
approximately $200 per month. In January of 2007, I was contacted
by Wolpoff & Abramson, who had someone serve paperwork (left at my
door step) with notification that a claim has been filed with the
NAF. Following this, the settlement offer was increased and
Wolpoff & Abramson refused to return calles and respond to emails
left to them by my credit management company. I responded to the
notification from NAF and showed this matter to be frivilous in
nature, and that Wolpoff & Abramson was making an unnecessary
claim against me. In July 07, the NAF ruled in favor of Wolpoff &
Abramson. What should I do to fight this decision? I do have
prove of all transactions and communications with MNBA, Wolpoff &
Abramson, and the NAF. Please Respond ASAP

On 3/11/07, stephen ballas wrote:
> On 2/12/07, John W. Gibson wrote:
>> Checking PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) I
>> found a number of lawsuits against Wolpoff & Abramson under the
>> Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In fact, I recently filed
>> one on behalf of a client in Pennsylvania state court. I
> prefer
>> state to federal court.
>>
>> The MBNA arbitration clause in the opinion of at least one
> court
>> does not apply if you sue Wolpoff & Abramson because you did
> not
>> agree to arbitrate with Wolpoff & Abramson. Wolpoff & Abramson
>> may have some connection with the National Arbitration Forum
>> there are a lot of allegations on the internet about this. If
>> you're in Pennsylvania, call me at (412) 471-7785 and I'll be
>> happy to discuss the case with you without any charge.
>
>
> It stands to reason. The paperwork that has been submitted in a
> matter I am involved with is typical of attorneys or those
> claiming to be attorneys qualified in the state in which the
> practice of law is being engaged in by these individuals.
>
> For instance, the arbitration case was handled by a attorney of
> the Wolpolff association of legal firms (as their letterhead
> indicates) from Maryland. Then, the award issued by
> the "neutral" arbitrator picked by MBNA or NAF then proceeded to
> an enforcement in the State Court system of California. The
> attorneys changed without any substitution of attorney
> notification. Further, the new filing substitutes an entity FIA
> Card Services, N.A. for MBNA as the moving party without any
> allegations of the permissibility of so doing.
>
> It's a plethora of mistakes and unlawful activity too numerous
> to for just this communication. I'm taking it further against
> them. Any assistance would be appreciated.