Re: were my rights violated?

More | Report Post

Under the current administration, the fourth amendment is a pretty
weak argument. A grand jury can come in and use it for an indictment,
the evidence can still be used to impeach, etc. For the most part it
is federal law, but I wouldn't presume to know the law of the state of
some random poster.

As for "hippo", there was no gain for commercial or otherwise. The
real issue here could be doctor-patent privilege. Again, that could be
weak, the way the Supreme Court has weakened hearsay laws.

I would not presume to know all of the facts of this case, and would
not try to advise her because of the changes to the law since 9/11.

On 12/05/06, S wrote:
> Yes I know what UPL means... Unathorized Practice of Law do you know
> what the fourth ammendment of the constitution is?? Let me refresh
> your memory on that one.......
>
> Amendment IV
>
> The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
> papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
> shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon
> probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly
> describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be
> seized.