Re: clarifiacation WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON threatening to SUE ME

More | Report Post

I wanted to clarify a statement I just wrote.

I wrote:

"Although the amount being demanded right now doesn't warrant
hiring an attorney at this point, the debt will quickly
increase to the point that it likely will be worth your while
to hire a local attorney to at least go over your options with
you."

I didn't mean to say that the amount you owe right now does
not warrant getting an attorney. I meant to say that if you
think that the amount you owe right now doesn't warrant an
attorney...

I have no way of knowing what amount you would consider
sufficient to hire an attorney, and I didn't mean to give the
impression that I do know that. Of course, only you know
that. Sorry for the confusion.

On 10/24/07, Edwin Fernandez wrote:
> On 8/07/07, 12 wrote:
>> Several years ago, I surrendered a vehicle to Chrysler.
>> Before doing so, I called them and asked what my options
>> were. I told them that I had a baby on the way, and that
>> the truck was not practical anymore, and I didn't want to
>> step up to a bigger monthly payment to get into something
>> else. They told me to just surrender the vehicle at my
>> nearest dealership, and that would work. I asked, "Will I
>> owe anything?" They said no, that I would just surrender
>> the vehicle and they would sell it again to recoup their
>> losses.
>>
>> Well, now I'm getting letters from W&A L.L.P. telling me
>> that they will sue. I don't own a house, or anything else
>> very valuable, no cars in my name. And I don't think they
>> can garnish my wages, can they?
>>
>> basically, I'm trying to find out how much validity I
>> should give these people. I don't want to have a judement
>> against me ... but I don't want to pay a $3k debt that I
>> didn't exactly agree to, either.