Re: judicial misconduct

More | Report Post

On 4/05/09, Curmudgeon wrote:
> Your name says it all.
>
> On 4/05/09, nottoobright wrote:
>> Do you think it is unlikely that a novice to the world of
>> law, lawsuits and courtroom procedure could sense when a
>> judge and a couple of lawyers are not playing fair? Add to
>> the equation one side is allowed to talk about matters not
>> before the court, and the other may not. Every Motion by
> the
>> silenced party is denied (And there were quite a few.)
> Judge
>> consults the other side for clarification on admissibility
>> and relevance. Judge cautions based on that false
>> information. The silenced side is threatened by the judge
>> without evidence. The other side lies about the lawsuit,
> the
>> opponent and no response is permitted.
>> How likely are you to side with the veterans vs keep quiet
>> silence boy?
The Judge has a reputation of excessively exceeding
guidelines,a Nasty reputation for smartmouthing and ridiculing
those that come befor him,defendant is being sued for a
divorce.defendants inexperienced young lawyer states that the
judge says he will punish the defendant if defendant does not
agree with judge and fights the case.Other side was allowed to
lie and when defendant offerd the trueth the judge immediately
cut off defendant and ridiculed defendant.defendants lawyer
offerd no arguement.