Post: Changing severance polices
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ab77/7ab77609ea50f381c51b773802d8ee9c313a8f7c" alt=""
Posted by Chris on 12/17/06
A friend of mine works for a non-profit that has updated their employee handbook. The handbook has always stated that the policy is employment at will. A few of the workers there have been there over 20 years. The previous handbooks have always stated that severance would be given based upon the employee's seniority. The new handbook says no severance will be given to anyone. None of the employees have yet to sign anything acknowledging they have received the new handbook. Should they refuse to sign? Will it make a difference - should they be laid off could they now be denied any severance at all? I'm an HR professional but I deal mainly with compensation issues and it has been a while since I have had any employment law classes! I know in a Union environment employees can refuse to sign and not be threatened with termination but can non-union employees do the same? Can they really change severance benefits after promising them for 20 years. Thanks for your help!
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Changing severance polices, 12/17/06, by Chris.
- Re: Changing severance polices, 12/20/06, by Terry.
- Re: Changing severance polices, 2/12/07, by RCW.
|