Re: Starbuck's ruling
Posted by George on 6/03/08
I guess you are right. Tip jars don't deceive customers into a false perception that customers have no righ to determine who should receive their tip and what amount they should receive. Judges are the one deceiving customers into a false perseption that they have no right to determine who should receive their tip and what amount they should receive. That's why managers at Starbucks can no longer receive a tip from a customer. Judges in California have ruled that because state laws state that agents of the employer are prohibitted from taking any part of the tips bestowed upon an employee, such a law should infinge on the constitutional rights of the consumer and deprive him his liberty to tip a manager. The truth of the matter is, state laws simply instruct that mandagers are prohibtted from taking tips customers have given an employee. State laws do not and would not attempt to suggest that American citizens cannot tip a manager or agent of the employer. The reason California judges are misinterpretting state laws in such a manner is to support their unsubstantiated opinion that employers are allowed to collect and control the customer's tip. By deceptively suggeting through court rulings that state laws govern who can or can't be included in a tip pool, the public is deceived into a false perception that employers are not confiscating and controllng their tips. Instead customers are fraudulently deceived into the notion that the courts, along with state laws are governing their tips. Is it fraud to suggest that state laws would have the authority to govern its citizen's personal property when our constitution has provisions specifically designed to protect against such governing? Truth makes many appeals, not the least of which is its power to shock. Jules Renard On 4/25/08, Martha wrote: > On 4/25/08, George wrote: >> .... >> Isn't it fraud to deceive consumers into a false perception that >> they have no right to determine, for themselves, who should >> receive their tip and what amount that person should receive? >> >> Isn't that exactly what tip jars do? >> > > Yes. > > No.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Starbuck's ruling, 4/22/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/22/08, by Ann.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/23/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/23/08, by Ann.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/24/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/24/08, by Ann.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by Martha.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 5/09/08, by sharwinston.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 5/27/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 6/03/08, by George .
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 6/04/08, by sharwinston.
|