Re: Response to Conanylizer

More | Report Post

George!!!! Man -- You haven't found that what you are saying is illegal? It is not legal for
any one to take your tips. In my online research i came across that law. All this time here, &
i'm not the one researching this. How come you haven't found it yet? I couldn't re-find that
site if i wanted to. But it's out there bud! Stop wasteing time here, go find the law. Then
take it further from there.

Good luck George! Hope you find what yur looking for.

On 5/23/09, sharwinston wrote:
> nobody cares, man........ nobody cares.
>
> On 5/20/09, George wrote:
>> If I am an idiot for not knowing that property is often
>> taken in court from those to whom it was given, then please
>> explain a case, other than one relating to tips, where
>> property was taken from someone in court without any
>> evidence to back up the ruling that such property should
>> be taken. My point is, shouldn't there be evidence to
>> support the taking of what someone has been given. Should
>> the legality of a taking really solely on the opinion of
>> judges?
>>
>> In one notable California case concerning forced tip
>> pooling, an employer was allowed to take tips away from
>> a waitress so that the tips could be shared among other
>> types of workers. Shouln't it be the restaurant's burden
>> to prove that restaurant customers intended that the tips
>> they have given are to be divided among the waiter, the
>> busboy and the bartender?
>>
>> If someone took your property, wouldn't you want the
>> courts to expect some kind of evidence to substantiate
>> that the taking of your property was legal?
>>
>>
>> On 5/19/09, Chewtoy wrote:
>>> On 5/19/09, George wrote:
>>>> The injustice of the situation is, when an employee
>>>> receives a tip from a customer, his employer is now
>>>> able to take the tip away from him with the excuse
>>>> that it might have been intended for someone else.
>>>>
>>>> Imagine someone stealing what another person has
>>>> given you and when you go before a judge, the judge
>>>> looks you straight in the eye and says "what was given
>>>> you wasn't intended for you, therefore I must rule
>>>> in favor of the party who took what was given you....
>>>
>>> We're back to the reasoned debate phase. What happened, your meds kick in? Get a
>>> revised 'script?
>>>
>>> 1. Property is often taken in court from those to whom it was given. Visit bankruptcy
>>> or family court to see property taken away.... All the time. You're an idiot for not
>>> knowing this, George.
>>>
>>> 2. You want a lawsuit over every tip (you idiot!)? That's why no one (no judge, not us)
>>> care about who wanted to give you (or anyone) any particular tip. We need a general
>>> rule. The courts have agreed the general rule is: almost no one cares who they tip. So,
>>> even if a particular tip was given to you, fk you, it goes into the pool.
>>>
>>> Want to jump to insults? Am I part of the conspiracy? Go fkursf. I ain't seen a dime
>>> from you, and you're not getting anything else.
>>>
>>> To all other non-George posters: sorry for responding; Chewtoy out.